Table 4.
Critical care usage increase with severity of AKI using three scoring systems with patient numbers (percentage of individuals in each category) (Binomial 95% confidence intervals)
|
RIFLE |
AKIN |
AKIB |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage | Patients admitted to critical care | Stage | Patients admitted to critical care | Stage | Patients admitted to critical care |
|
No AKI |
12 (2.2%) |
No AKI |
10 (1.8%) |
No AKI |
12 (2.1%) |
| (1.1 to 3.7) |
|
(0.9 to 3.3) |
|
(1.1 to 3.6) |
|
|
Risk |
3 (2.9%) |
1 |
5 (4.3%) |
1 |
1 (1.5%) |
| (0.6 to 8.2) |
|
(1.4 to 9.7) |
|
(0.0 to 8.2) |
|
|
Injury |
5 (10.4%) |
2 |
4 (11.8%) |
2 |
7 (11.7%) |
| (3.5 to 22.7) |
|
(3.3 to 27.5) |
|
(4.8 to 22.6) |
|
| Failure | 4 (20.0%) |
3 |
5 (23.8%) |
3 |
4 (13.3%) |
| (5.7 to 43.7) | (8.2 to 47.2) | (3.8 to 30.7) | |||
Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative “RIFLE” criteria (risk, injury, failure, loss, End Stage Renal Disease), “AKIN” (Acute Kidney Injury Network), “AKIB” Acute Kidney Injury (Bonventre), MDRD eGFR (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.