Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 20;24(7):1610–1620. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3145-6

Table 2.

Inter-observer reliability of MRI measurements from identical source images for both summary measures and individual muscle ROI values

Measure 1st observer group (mean ± SD) 2nd observer group (mean ± SD) ICC Limits of agreement n
Thigh level—overall mean for each subject
 Fat fraction (%) 1.33 ± 0.50 1.24 ± 0.41a 0.93 -0.39 to +0.21 15
 T1 (ms) 1,293 ± 33 1,287 ± 34 0.95 -26 to +14 15
 T2 (ms) 41.97 ± 2.20 42.01 ± 2.22 0.98 -0.93 to +1.00 15
 MTR (p.u.) 32.29 ± 1.37 32.34 ± 1.27 0.99 -0.49 to +0.59 15
Calf level—overall mean for each subject
 Fat fraction (%) 1.54 ± 0.65 1.51 ± 0.57 0.95 -0.41 to +0.33 15
 T1 (ms) 1,275 ± 63 1,276 ± 66 0.99 -23 to +24 14
 T2 (ms) 39.89 ± 1.75 39.75 ± 1.79 0.96 -1.08 to +0.80 15
 MTR (p.u.) 32.75 ± 0.57 32.84 ± 0.56 0.95 -0.25 to +0.43 15
Thigh level—individual ROI values
 Fat fraction (%) 1.32 ± 0.91 1.23 ± 0.91a 0.79 -1.04 to +1.22 281
 T1 (ms) 1,289 ± 88 1,284 ± 94 0.93 -62 to +72 221
 T2 (ms) 41.96 ± 3.19 42.00 ± 3.61 0.84 -3.82 to +3.75 280
 MTR (p.u.) 32.36 ± 1.80 32.34 ± 1.91 0.90 -1.59 to +1.63 248
Calf level individual ROI values
 Fat fraction (%) 1.55 ± 0.97 1.50 ± 0.98 0.83 -1.08 to +1.17 172
 T1 (ms) 1,269 ± 81 1,269 ± 81 0.95 -48 to +50 138
 T2 (ms) 39.89 ± 2.60 39.75 ± 2.69 0.86 -2.59 to +2.88 180
 MTR (p.u.) 32.76 ± 1.36 32.83 ± 1.31 0.92 -1.15 to +1.00 175

Limits of agreement are calculated ± 1.96 SD by Bland-Altman method

ICC intra-class correlation coefficient

a Evidence of systematic difference between scans/observers (p < 0.001, Bland-Altman method)