Skip to main content
. 2014 May 24;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-19-29

Table 4.

Comparison of Parkinson’s disease patients regarding normal vs abnormal stereopsis a

Data parameters
PD patients ( N = 45)
  Normal stereopsis ( n = 26) (mean ± SD) Abnormal stereopsis ( n = 19) (mean ± SD) P -value Adjusted P -value
Age (yr)
64.58 ± 8.31
66.53 ± 10.79
0.497
 
H&Y stage
2.04 ± 0.73
2.40 ± 0.59
0.089
 
UPDRS part III score
20.81 ± 7.48
31.16 ± 16.54
0.018b
0.112
UPDRS total score
37.15 ± 13.96
49.74 ± 24.14
0.033b
 
TAN (PPT scores)
37.41 ± 9.48
30.00 ± 9.61
0.014b
0.575
MMSE score
28.04 ± 1.74
26.78 ± 4.22
0.187
 
MoCA score
24.96 ± 3.70
22.67 ± 6.22
0.150
 
Line connection
0.66 ± 0.48
0.61 ± 0.50
0.692
 
Copy cube
0.76 ± 0.44
0.55 ± 0.51
0.083
 
Drawing clock
2.31 ± 0.97
2.06 ± 1.06
0.311
 
Disease duration (yr)
6.59 ± 5.34
6.61 ± 3.34
0.989
 
TES
110.85 ± 65.19
170.00 ± 97.63
0.019b
 
PES (red)
27.23 ± 23.31
41.32 ± 29.33
0.08
 
PES (green)
23.96 ± 14.61
40.74 ± 17.17
0.001c
0.027b
PES (blue)
39.04 ± 25.08
53.95 ± 36.00
0.108
 
PES (purple) 20.54 ± 14.78 34.00 ± 27.23 0.039b 0.409

aH&Y, Hoehn and Yahr; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PES, Partial error score; PPT, Purdue Pegboard Test; TAN, total average number; TES, Total error score; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. b P < 0.05; cP < 0.01. For the adjusted P-value, a logistic regression model was used with stereopsis (normal or abnormal) as the dependent variable.