Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 1;24(6):958–965. doi: 10.1089/thy.2013.0573

Table 2.

Comparison of Clinical and Pathological Characteristics Between Hobnail PTC Cases of Published Case Series and the Cases in the Present Study

Study (# cases) F:M Age (years)* Inclusion criteria Tumor size (cm)* % pTNM Stage III/IV LVI (%) Lymph node metastasis (%) Distant metastasis (%) Follow-up (mo)# Disease-specific survival (%)
Asioli et al. 2012 (29) (n=24) 18:6 57.3±12.0 Nonsolid type PTC; ≤10% tall/columnar or diffuse sclerosing features; loss of polarity/cohesiveness with hobnail/micropapillary features in ≥10% of tumor cells; available clinical and follow-up data and pathologic material 3.0±1.7 58.3 70.8 60.9 43.5 95 (21–165) 66.6
Lino-Silva et al. 2012 (14) (n=7) 3:4 45.9±13.4 Neoplastic cells with papillary morphology, abundant, clear or oncocytic cytoplasm, without true fibrovascular cores, surrounded by a clear halo of fibers surrounded by fibrous stroma; pleomorphic and hyperchromatic nuclei; nuclear grooves; reverse polarity 4.4±0.3 71.4 71.4 57.1 42.9 69 (64–74) 42.9
Present study (n=12) 9:3 54.1±18.8 Hobnail features in >30% of the tumor; TCF in <30% of the tumors 3.7±2.0 58.3 41.7 75.0 25.0 26 (14–35.5) 90.9
*

Mean age±standard deviation; #median (interquartile range).