Table 3.
DEFA1A3 copy number | This study (N = 589) | Observed frequency | Predicted frequency (HWE) | Reconstructed from | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aldred (N = 111) | Linzmeier (N = 27) | Nuytten (N = 344) | ||||
≤3 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0 | 0 | 0.006 |
4 | 28 | 0.048 | 0.045 | 0.027 | 0 | 0.037 |
5 | 69 | 0.117 | 0.129 | 0.144 | 0.037 | 0.192 |
6 | 117 | 0.199 | 0.177 | 0.261 | 0 | 0.372 |
7 | 121 | 0.205 | 0.215 | 0.243 | 0.111 | 0.257 |
8 | 129 | 0.219 | 0.205 | 0.198 | 0.111 | 0.087 |
9 | 64 | 0.109 | 0.113 | 0.108 | 0.111 | 0.043 |
10 | 37 | 0.063 | 0.085 | 0.009 | 0.259 | 0.006 |
11 | 13 | 0.022 | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.074 | 0 |
12+ | 10 | 0.017 | 0.010 | 0 | 0.296 | 0 |
Distributions of diploid copy numbers in the 589 European samples typed in this work, and comparison with data taken or inferred from the previous studies of Aldred et al.[30], Linzmeier and Ganz [7], and Nuytten et al.[52]. The comparison is also made between the observed frequencies of copy number classes and those predicted from the haplotype frequencies determined in this study, assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (“Predicted frequency (HWE)”). The frequencies of copy number classes were not given explicitly by Nuytten et al.[52], but are reconstructed here from the data in their Figure seven (a). Jespersgaard et al.[47] do not give details of individual copy number counts, but instead give counts above or below a copy number of 6.