Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2010 Feb 11;50(4):213–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.02.001

Table 1.

Correlates of daughter involvement in HPV vaccination decision making (North Carolina, USA, 2008).

Total n (%) Bivariate β Multivariate β
Daughter’s age
 11–14 years (Ref) 235 (36.3)
 15–17 years 236 (36.5) .28** .24**
 18–20 years 176 (27.2) .48** .41**
Parent’s perception of daughter’s sexual activitya
 Not sexually active (Ref) 327 (50.5)
 May be sexually active 219 (33.9) .20** .03
 Sexually active 101 (15.6) .29** .11*
Doctor recommend daughter get HPV vaccine
 No (Ref) 495 (76.5)
 Yes 152 (23.5) .09* .08*
Parent demographic characteristics
Age
 <45 years (Ref) 305 (47.1)
 45+ years 342 (52.9) .15 .07
Sex
 Female (Ref) 609 (94.1)
 Male 38 (5.9) .05
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white (Ref) 479 (74.0)
 Non-Hispanic black 131 (20.3) .02
 Hispanic or other 37 (5.7) −.00
Education
 High school or less (Ref) 122 (18.9)
 Some college or more 525 (81.1) −.03
Marital status
 Married (Ref) 554 (85.6)
 Other 93 (14.4) .00
Annual household income
 <$60,000 (Ref) 259 (40.0)
 $60,000+ 361 (55.8) .01
 Missing 27 (4.2) −.07
Area of residence
 Rural (Ref) 321 (49.6)
 Urban 326 (50.4) .05

Note. Table reports standardized regression coefficients (β) from linear regression models of daughter’s involvement in the decision about whether to get vaccinated against HPV [mean: 2.55, SD=1.21, range 1–4; 1=“none” (28.2%), 2=“a little” (20.9%), 3=“a moderate amount” (18.9%), 4=“a lot” (32.0%)]. Multivariate model includes all correlates significant (p<.05) in bivariate models. Ref=reference category, SD=standard deviation.

*

p≤.05,

**

p≤.001.

a

Parent’s perception of daughter’s sexual activity (1=not sexually active and will not be in next year, 2=may already be sexually active or may become sexually active in next year, and 3=either currently sexually active or will become sexually active in next year).