Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2010 Feb 11;50(4):213–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.02.001

Table 1.

Correlates of daughter involvement in HPV vaccination decision making (North Carolina, USA, 2008).

Total n (%) Bivariate β Multivariate β
Daughter’s age
 11–14 years (Ref) 235 (36.3) – –
 15–17 years 236 (36.5) .28** .24**
 18–20 years 176 (27.2) .48** .41**
Parent’s perception of daughter’s sexual activitya
 Not sexually active (Ref) 327 (50.5) – –
 May be sexually active 219 (33.9) .20** .03
 Sexually active 101 (15.6) .29** .11*
Doctor recommend daughter get HPV vaccine
 No (Ref) 495 (76.5) – –
 Yes 152 (23.5) .09* .08*
Parent demographic characteristics
Age
 <45 years (Ref) 305 (47.1) – –
 45+ years 342 (52.9) .15 .07
Sex
 Female (Ref) 609 (94.1) –
 Male 38 (5.9) .05
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white (Ref) 479 (74.0) –
 Non-Hispanic black 131 (20.3) .02
 Hispanic or other 37 (5.7) −.00
Education
 High school or less (Ref) 122 (18.9) –
 Some college or more 525 (81.1) −.03
Marital status
 Married (Ref) 554 (85.6) –
 Other 93 (14.4) .00
Annual household income
 <$60,000 (Ref) 259 (40.0) –
 $60,000+ 361 (55.8) .01
 Missing 27 (4.2) −.07
Area of residence
 Rural (Ref) 321 (49.6) –
 Urban 326 (50.4) .05

Note. Table reports standardized regression coefficients (β) from linear regression models of daughter’s involvement in the decision about whether to get vaccinated against HPV [mean: 2.55, SD=1.21, range 1–4; 1=“none” (28.2%), 2=“a little” (20.9%), 3=“a moderate amount” (18.9%), 4=“a lot” (32.0%)]. Multivariate model includes all correlates significant (p<.05) in bivariate models. Ref=reference category, SD=standard deviation.

*

p≤.05,

**

p≤.001.

a

Parent’s perception of daughter’s sexual activity (1=not sexually active and will not be in next year, 2=may already be sexually active or may become sexually active in next year, and 3=either currently sexually active or will become sexually active in next year).