Table 5.
Estimated variance components (±SE) from a traditional animal model ignoring IGE (model 3) 1
| Parameter | Neck BMS | Body BMS | Tail BMS | Total BMS | Weight (Kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.62 ± 0.15 |
1.06 ± 0.22 |
0.95 ± 0.19 |
7.26 ± 1.38 |
0.06 ± 0.015 |
|
|
|
0.28 ± 0.047 |
0.26 ± 0.04 |
0.17 ± 0.028 |
0.26 ± 0.04 |
-0.15 ± 0.09 |
|
|
|
0.05 ± 0.054 |
-0.09 ± 0.05 |
-0.17 ± 0.03 |
-0.09 ± 0.05 |
0.40 ± 0.19 |
|
|
|
1.18 ± 0.12 |
2.74 ± 0.22 |
2.31 ± 0.20 |
11.4 ± 1.14 |
0.026 ± 0.008 |
|
|
|
2.93 ± 0.22 |
3.53 ± 0.27 |
5.98 ± 0.34 |
22.4 ± 1.72 |
0.03 ± 0.009 |
|
|
|
3.54 ± 0.11 |
4.95 ± 0.24 |
5.31 ± 0.18 |
31.09 ± 1.00 |
0.011 ± 0.005 |
|
|
|
0.18 ± 0.04 |
0.21 ± 0.08 |
0.18 ± 0.036 |
0.23 ± 0.04 |
0.57 ± 0.13 |
|
| - | - | - | - | 0.07 ± 0.05 |
1Model 3 was y = Xb + Z D a D + Wg + Vg * s + e; 2although cage and cage*sex covariances were fitted, the result is expressed as the non-genetic correlation between phenotypes of cage mates, , and as the non-genetic correlation between phenotypes of cage mates of the same sex, ; 3for BMS, phenotypic variance was estimated from a separate analysis using the model y = Xb + e, this was done because our objective was to present a single number for phenotypic variance and heritability, covering both sexes, since a single genetic variance was fitted covering both sexes; however, since our aim was to estimate the other model terms with the best fitting model, a separate analysis for phenotypic variance was performed; the standard errors of heritability estimates were calculated from the full model, averaging the residual variances for both sexes; , refers to the non-genetic dam variance; refers to the non-genetic maternal effect.