Skip to main content
. 2014 May 7;46(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-30

Table 5.

Estimated variance components (±SE) from a traditional animal model ignoring IGE (model 3) 1

Parameter Neck BMS Body BMS Tail BMS Total BMS Weight (Kg)
σ^A2

0.62 ± 0.15
1.06 ± 0.22
0.95 ± 0.19
7.26 ± 1.38
0.06 ± 0.015
2ρ^

0.28 ± 0.047
0.26 ± 0.04
0.17 ± 0.028
0.26 ± 0.04
-0.15 ± 0.09
2ρ^s

0.05 ± 0.054
-0.09 ± 0.05
-0.17 ± 0.03
-0.09 ± 0.05
0.40 ± 0.19
σ^em2

1.18 ± 0.12
2.74 ± 0.22
2.31 ± 0.20
11.4 ± 1.14
0.026 ± 0.008
σ^ef2

2.93 ± 0.22
3.53 ± 0.27
5.98 ± 0.34
22.4 ± 1.72
0.03 ± 0.009
3σ^P2

3.54 ± 0.11
4.95 ± 0.24
5.31 ± 0.18
31.09 ± 1.00
0.011 ± 0.005
h^2

0.18 ± 0.04
0.21 ± 0.08
0.18 ± 0.036
0.23 ± 0.04
0.57 ± 0.13
c^2
- - - - 0.07 ± 0.05

1Model 3 was y = Xb + Z D a D  + Wg + Vg * s + e; 2although cage and cage*sex covariances were fitted, the result is expressed as the non-genetic correlation between phenotypes of cage mates, ρ^=σ^g2σ^g*s2+σ^g2+0.5σ^em2+σ^ef2, and as the non-genetic correlation between phenotypes of cage mates of the same sex, ρ^s=σ^g*s2σ^g*s2+σ^g2+0.5σ^em2+σ^ef2 ; 3for BMS, phenotypic variance was estimated from a separate analysis using the model y = Xb + e, this was done because our objective was to present a single number for phenotypic variance and heritability, covering both sexes, since a single genetic variance was fitted covering both sexes; however, since our aim was to estimate the other model terms with the best fitting model, a separate analysis for phenotypic variance was performed; the standard errors of heritability estimates were calculated from the full model, averaging the residual variances for both sexes; c^2=σ^nd2σ^p2, σ^nd2 refers to the non-genetic dam variance; c^2 refers to the non-genetic maternal effect.