Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Perinatol. 2014 Jan 23;34(4):252–263. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.177

Table 4.

Summary of findings on gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies and maternal outcomes among studies that controlled for prepregnancy BMI and gestational age at delivery

Study GWG measure Outcome defined Control variables Results
Gestational diabetes
Fox et al. 2010 (A) (26) and 2011 (B) (27) Adequacy of GWGa GDM (definition not specified) A: None
B: Race, pregravid BMI, age, IVF, GA, chorionicity, fetal reduction
A: No difference in GDM prevalence comparing low GWG vs. normal GWG in NL (6.2% vs. 4.1%, p=0.5), OV (11.8% vs. 8.8%, p=0.7) or OB (0% vs. 30%, p=0.08).
B: No difference in GDM prevalence comparing low, normal, and excessive GWG overall (7.3%, 7.9%, 2.6%, p=0.15) or among NL (7.0%, 2.0%, 0%, p=0.9).
Gónzalez-Quintero et al. 2012 (28) Rate of total GWG compared with the 2009 IOM recs (<IOM vs. ≥IOM) a GDM (definition not specified) None Higher prevalence of GDM in those gaining below IOM guidelines vs. at or above guidelines overall (12.7% vs. 8.7%, p<0.0001) and in NL (11.6% vs. 7.2%, p<0.0001), but not in OV (11.6% vs. 8.7%, p=0.1) or OB (17.3% vs. 13.2%, p=0.09).
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Fox et al. 2010 (A) (26) and 2011 (B) (27) Adequacy of GWGa Gestational hypertension; preeclampsia (both defined using 2002 ACOG criteria) A: None
B: Race, pregravid BMI, age, IVF, GA, chorionicity, fetal reduction
A: No difference in gestational hypertension prevalence comparing low GWG vs. normal GWG in NL (13.9% vs. 19.8%, p=0.2), OV (11.8% vs. 21.2%, p=0.4) or OB (25.0% vs. 20.0%, p=0.7).
B: No difference in gestational hypertension prevalence comparing low, normal, and excessive GWG overall (12.7%, 9.2%, 13.2%, p=0.9) or among NL (7.0%, 8.2%, 12.0%, p=0.6). No difference in preeclampsia prevalence comparing low, normal, and excessive GWG overall (7.3%, 7.9%, 10.5%, p=0.8) or among NL (7.0%, 8.2%, 12.0%, p=0.8).
Gónzalez-Quintero et al. 2012 (28) Rate of total GWG compared with the 2009 IOM recs (<IOM vs. ≥IOM) a Pregnancy-related hypertension (definition not specified) None Lower prevalence of pregnancy-related hypertension in those gaining below IOM guidelines vs. at or above guidelines overall (16.3% vs. 22.5%, p<0.0001), in NL (12.2% vs. 17.4%, p<0.0001), and in OV (17.7% vs. 27.2%, p=0.001), but not OB (26.3% vs. 30.9, p=0.1)
Luke et al. 1993b (35) Total GWG and rate of GWG at ≤24 wk and >24 wks Preeclampsia (defined using the 1986 ACOG criteria) None Compared with controls, preeclamptic pregnancies had higher total GWG (21.1 kg vs. 17.2 kg, p<0.0001), higher rate of total GWG (0.61 kg/wk vs. 0.54 kg/wk, p<0.0001), and higher rate of GWG at >24 weeks (0.97 kg/wk vs. 0.66 kg/wk, p<0.0001), but there was no difference in rate of GWG ≤24 wk (0.47 kg/wk vs. 0.44 kg/wk, p=ns).

ACOG, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; ART, assisted reproductive technologies; BMI, body mass index; GA, gestational age; GDM, gestational diabetes; GWG, gestational weight gain; IOM, Institute of Medicine; IVF, in vitro fertilization; NL, normal weight before pregnancy; OB, obese before pregnancy; OV, overweight before pregnancy;

a

Rate of total GWG compared with the 2009 IOM recommendations divided by 37 weeks.