Table 5.

Results of linear and logistic regression modeling for three outcomes, with beta coefficients/odds ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals

	Number Anal Sex Partners	Sex While High	Sex While Drunk
Age
18–24	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)
25–34	−0.1 (−0.21, 0)	0.57 (0.35, 0.93)	0.85 (0.57, 1.27)
35–44	−0.06 (−0.18, 0.05)	0.59 (0.34, 1)	0.57 (0.37, 0.9)
45+	−0.24 (−0.36, −0.11)	0.57 (0.32, 1.01)	0.25 (0.15, 0.43)
Race
White	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)
Black	−0.15 (−0.24,−0.06)	0.87 (0.57, 1.32)	0.61 (0.43, 0.85)
Latino/Other	0.01 (−0.11, 0.12)	0.57 (0.31, 1.06)	0.47 (0.3, 0.73)
Education
High School/Less	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)
Some college/2-year	0.1 (−0.02, 0.21)	0.66 (0.4, 1.07)	0.56 (0.37, 0.86)
College/College+	0.12 (0, 0.23)	0.51 (0.31, 0.85)	0.72 (0.47, 1.1)
Employment
Employed	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)
Unemployed	0 (−0.09, 0.1)	0.88 (0.56, 1.37)	0.82 (0.57, 1.2)
HIV Status
Negative	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)
Positive	0.32 (0.23, 0.41)	2.72 (1.8, 4.13)	1.09 (0.76, 1.57)
Never tested/unknown	−0.54(−0.74,−0.35)	0.85 (0.41, 1.8)	0.82 (0.47, 1.43)
Sexual Orientation
Homosexual	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)
Bisexual	−0.30 (−0.44,−0.17)	0.67 (0.35, 1.28)	1.44 (0.88, 2.37)
Completely Open about Sexuality
Yes	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)
No	0.44 (0.35, 0.53)	1.22 (0.76, 1.97)	0.81 (0.55, 1.19)
Has a Main Partner
No	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)	1.0 (ref)
Yes	−0.41 (−0.49,−0.33)	0.89 (0.62, 1.28)	1.22 (0.91, 1.62)
Network LGB Ratio	0.43 (0.29, 0.57)	--
Network Partnered LGB Ratio	−0.39 (−0.55,−0.24)	--
Network Outness Ratio	--	0.20 (0.06, 0.74)
Network Mean Age Difference	--		1.04 (1.02, 1.07)

Significant findings are shown in bold italics.