Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 9;13(6):1598–1610. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.037465

Table IV. Comparison of four methods for high-throughput glycomic and glycoproteomic analysis.

UPLC-FLR xCGE-LIF MALDI-TOF-MS LC-ESI-MS
Acceptance/usage for glycomics Widely used Rarely used Widely used Moderately used
Throughput Medium, approximately 50 samples per instrument per day (Very) high, multiplexing with up to 96 capillaries enables analysis of thousands of samples (Very) high, as measurement of a sample can be performed at a sub-minute time scale Medium, approximately 100 samples per day per instrument
Required expertise Medium Medium High Very high
Resolution High High Very high Very high
Isomer separation Good Very good None Some
Quantification Very good Good Medium Good
Costs of equipment Ca. Euro 40–70,000 Ca. Euro 100,000 for a 4-capillary instrument Ca. Euro 100–500,000 Euro 200–500,000
Costs per sample in high throughput mode Rather high costs, mainly due to low throughput and costs of consumables Low costs per sample, due to low running costs and parallelization by multiplexing Low costs per sample due to high throughput per instrument Very high costs, mainly due to expensive equipment and low throughput per instrument
Main advantages for genetic and epidemiological studies Reliable quantification, robustness Less demanding in sample preparation, low costs, high robustness and high throughput, no sample carry over; reliable relative quantification, very sensitive (low LOD) Low cost and high throughput, site specific glycosylation analysis, sensitive, enables structural elucidation via fragmentation experiments Reliable quantification, site specific glycosylation analysis, sensitive, enables structural elucidation via fragmentation experiments
Main disadvantages for genetic and epidemiological studies Inability to perform site specific glycosylation analysis, relatively low throughput and high cost Inability to perform site specific glycosylation analysis, comparatively small database (to be enlarged) Less reliable quantification, loss of sialic acids Relatively high costs
Specific advantages for IgG glycosylation analysis Differentiation of galactosylation on 3- and 6-arms, accurate quantification of IgG sialylation Differentiation of galactosylation on 3- and 6-arms, accurate quantification of IgG sialylation Differentiation of glycans on different IgG subclasses, analysis of only Fc glycans Differentiation of glycans on different IgG subclasses, analysis of only Fc glycans, accurate quantification of IgG sialylation