Skip to main content
. 2014 May 27;6:29. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-6-29

Table 5.

Benchmarking analysis

Data
Method
q
 
Runtime seconds
 
x-fold to Ref
set       Ref GT640 C2075   GT640 C2075
 
RASCAL
40
 
42
11
2.2
 
4
19
 
NB
40
 
8.8
1.4
0.3
 
6
29
2C9
PRW
40
 
436
114
32
 
4
14
 
NB
175
 
8.2
1.3
0.3
 
6
27
 
PRW
175
 
7.0
31
3.6
 
0.2
2
 
RASCAL
40
 
57
15
3.0
 
4
19
 
NB
40
 
12
1.9
0.4
 
6
30
2D6
PRW
40
 
727
157
44
 
5
17
 
NB
175
 
11
1.8
0.4
 
6
28
 
PRW
175
 
9.7
43
5.0
 
0.2
2
 
RASCAL
40
 
298
66
13
 
5
23
 
NB
40
 
55
8.3
1.8
 
7
31
3A4
PRW
40
 
3,654
714
201
 
5
18
 
NB
175
 
53
8.1
1.8
 
7
29
  PRW 175   45 197 23   0.2 2

Table shows the time taken in seconds and relative performance o the reference (Ref) to run all three classifiers over the three data sets using a scenario with bond depth of 6 (175 features) and j = 201 and q = 40. The reference is a single Intel Xeon E5506 at 2.13GHz. The number of vectors in data sets CYP 2C9, 2D6 and 3A4 are 2905, 3399 and 7294, respectively.