Table 8. Prices of pentavalent vaccines paid by the Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunization, 2001–2014.
Year | Number of suppliers |
Mean pricea (US$/dose) | Comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNCs | BRICS | Other | |||
2001 | 1 (GSK) | 0 | 0 | 3.50 | |
2004 | 1 (GSK) | 0 | 0 | 3.56 | Lyophilized vaccine, with limited supply |
2006 | 2 (Crucell and GSK) | 0 | 0 | 3.50 | New supply from Crucell, with more desirable, liquid presentation |
2009 | 2 (Crucell and GSK) | 2 (Panacea and Shantha) | 0 | 3.20 | Shantha supplied 2008–July 2010 |
2010 | 2 (Crucell and GSK) | 2 (Panacea and Shantha) | 0 | 3.00 | Panacea supplied 2008–May 2011 |
2011 | 2 (Crucell and GSK) | 2 (Panacea and Serum Institute of India) | 0 | 2.58 | |
2012 | 2 (Crucell and GSK) | 2 (Biological E. and Serum Institute of India) | 0 | 2.17 | 10-dose presentation supplied by Serum Institute of India. GSK product with limited supply |
2014 | 2 (Crucell and GSK) | 2 (Biological E. and Serum Institute of India) | 1 (LG Life Sciences) | 1.78 or 1.95b | 10-dose vials from Biological E (at US$ 1.19/dose) and Serum Institute of India at (US$ 1.75–2.10/dose). Lyophilized product in 2-dose vials from LG Life Sciences (at US$ 1.98/dose) |
BRICS: Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa; GSK: GlaxoSmithKline; MNCs: multinational corporations; US$: United States dollars.
a Weighted, when there was more than one supplier, by the number of doses bought from each supplier.
b Depending on presentation, with higher mean price for lyophilized product.
Data sources: Milstien and Kaddar (2010),39 United Nations Children’s Fund23 and World Health Organization.9,40