Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 1;92(6):436–446. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.133298

Table 8. Prices of pentavalent vaccines paid by the Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunization, 2001–2014.

Year Number of suppliers
Mean pricea (US$/dose) Comments
MNCs BRICS Other
2001 1 (GSK) 0 0 3.50
2004 1 (GSK) 0 0 3.56 Lyophilized vaccine, with limited supply
2006 2 (Crucell and GSK) 0 0 3.50 New supply from Crucell, with more desirable, liquid presentation
2009 2 (Crucell and GSK) 2 (Panacea and Shantha) 0 3.20 Shantha supplied 2008–July 2010
2010 2 (Crucell and GSK) 2 (Panacea and Shantha) 0 3.00 Panacea supplied 2008–May 2011
2011 2 (Crucell and GSK) 2 (Panacea and Serum Institute of India) 0 2.58
2012 2 (Crucell and GSK) 2 (Biological E. and Serum Institute of India) 0 2.17 10-dose presentation supplied by Serum Institute of India. GSK product with limited supply
2014 2 (Crucell and GSK) 2 (Biological E. and Serum Institute of India) 1 (LG Life Sciences) 1.78 or 1.95b 10-dose vials from Biological E (at US$ 1.19/dose) and Serum Institute of India at (US$ 1.75–2.10/dose). Lyophilized product in 2-dose vials from LG Life Sciences (at US$ 1.98/dose)

BRICS: Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa; GSK: GlaxoSmithKline; MNCs: multinational corporations; US$: United States dollars.

a Weighted, when there was more than one supplier, by the number of doses bought from each supplier.

b Depending on presentation, with higher mean price for lyophilized product.

Data sources: Milstien and Kaddar (2010),39 United Nations Children’s Fund23 and World Health Organization.9,40