Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012 Jul;59(7):1602–1608. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2360

Table III.

CNR and SNR values of the simulated lesion when imaged with the conventional 1D and the 1.5D ARFI array (n = 30). A 2.92 dB average improvement in CNR was achieved with the 1.5D ARFI array (two-sided t-test, p < 0.0001). The average SNR values inside and outside the lesion were also significantly improved with the 1.5D ARFI array (p < 0.0001).

Transducer CNR (dB) SNRlesion (dB) SNRtissue (dB)
Conventional 1D 6.91±1.21 7.29±0.62 14.48±0.97
1.5D ARFI 9.82±0.83 11.02±0.68 23.26±1.64