Table 3.
Study | Type∗ | Case definition for CTS†,‡ | Types of industry or occupation |
---|---|---|---|
Barnhart et al (1991) [19] | CS | Electrophysiologic study, physical examination criteria, and symptoms | Ski manufacturing |
de Krom et al (1990) [16] | CC | Electrophysiologic study and symptoms (>twice/week) | Industry plant workers (reference group: general population) |
de Krom et al (1990) | CC | Electrophysiologic study and symptoms (>twice/week) | Industry plant workers (reference group: general population) |
English et al (1995) [18] | CC | Diagnosed as CTS case | Various occupations |
Feldman et al (1987) [17] | CS | Electrophysiologic study, symptoms, and physical examination (sensation, finger grip, strength of the thenar muscle) | Electronic assembly workers |
Marras and Schoenmarklin (1993) [20] | CS | Determined by US OSHA 200 log (diagnosed high-risk group) | Industrial plant workers |
Moore and Garg (1994) [3] | CS | Electrophysiologic study and symptoms (from US OSHA logs and employee medical records) | Pork processing plant workers |
Osorio et al (1994) [21] | CS | Electrophysiologic study or CTS symptoms | Grocery store workers |
Tanaka et al (1995) [22] | CS | Symptoms; diagnosed as CTS case | Industry plant workers |
CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; OSHA = Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Type: CS: cross-sectional study CC: case–control study.
Physical examination criteria: Phalen's sign or Tinel's sign.
Symptoms: Numbness, tingling, burning in digits 1, 2, or 3.