Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD007543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007543.pub2

Kawamori 1991.

Methods A randomized, prospective study was undertaken to determine the glycemic threshold in 50 people treated with insulin who were showing an early stage of diabetic microangiopathies and who had been treated with once or twice daily intermediate‐acting insulin injection for an average period of 6.3 years. These were divided randomly into 2 groups.
Participants People with non‐insulin dependent diabetes who had been taking once to twice daily intermediate acting insulin for an average duration of 6.3 years
Interventions 22 participants, maintained on intermediate‐acting insulin (once daily injection) therapy, were used as the control group (CIT). The other 28 participants were given multiple insulin injection therapy (MIT). In the latter group, all participants were treated with multiple insulin injections, receiving either short‐, intermediate‐, or long‐acting insulin. During the experimental period, in both groups, insulin doses were frequent adjusted to accomplish as strict glycemic control as possible.
Outcomes Median nerve motor conduction velocity
Notes Report lacks many details
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Divided randomly into two groups” but method not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not stated
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk The different frequencies of injections made blinding participants and treating physicians impossible. No mention is made of blinding the neurophysiologist measuring the nerve conduction velocity.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk It is not said that all participants were followed up but no dropouts are mentioned
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The report is not sufficiently detailed to allow a judgment
Other bias Unclear risk The report is not sufficiently detailed to allow a judgment. There is not enough information to determine if baseline characteristics were equal between groups.