Table 2.
Treatment Group | Lung Structure | p-value |
---|---|---|
Control Animal vs OVA-induced Injury*** |
Epithelial Thickness |
0.000 |
Control Animal vs OVA-induced Injury*** |
Mucosal Thickness |
0.000 |
Control Animal vs OVA-induced Injury** |
Sub Mucosal Thickness |
0.003 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 25% Honey as Rescue Agent*** |
Epithelial Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 25% Honey as Rescue Agent* |
Mucosal Thickness |
0.018 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 25% Honey as Rescue Agent# |
Sub Mucosal Thickness |
0.219 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 50% Honey as Rescue Agent* |
Epithelial Thickness |
0.036 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 50% Honey as Rescue Agent** |
Mucosal Thickness |
0.009 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 50% Honey as Rescue Agent# |
Sub Mucosal Thickness |
0.155 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 25% Honey as Preventive Agent*** |
Epithelial Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 25% Honey as Preventive Agent** |
Mucosal Thickness |
0.006 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 25% Honey as Preventive Agent# |
Sub Mucosal Thickness |
0.326 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 50% Honey as Preventive Agent*** |
Epithelial Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 50% Honey as Preventive Agent*** |
Mucosal Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs 50% Honey as Preventive Agent# |
Sub Mucosal Thickness |
0.211 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey as Rescue Agent*** |
Epithelial Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey as Rescue Agent** |
Mucosal Thickness |
0.002 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey as Rescue Agent# |
Sub Mucosal Thickness |
0.104 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey as Preventive Agent*** |
Epithelial Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey as Preventive Agent*** |
Mucosal Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey as Preventive Agent# |
Sub Mucosal Thickness |
0.168 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey Treatment*** |
Epithelial Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey Treatment*** |
Mucosal Thickness |
0.000 |
OVA-induced Injury vs Honey Treatment# | Sub Mucosal Thickness | 0.081 |
*p < 0.05.
**p < 0.01.
***p < 0.001.
#p > 0.05.