Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 28;31(6):675–681. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0211-6

Table 1.

The characteristics of eligible studies of meta-analysis

First author (year) Ethnicity (country) Sample size (case/control) Genotyping methods Source of control PCOS diagnosis Matching criteria HWE P value
Waterworth(1) (1997) Caucasian (London) 59/54 NR PB Ultrasound symptoms NR 0.142
Waterworth(2) (1997) Caucasian (London) 39/39 NR FB Ultrasound symptoms NR 0.006
Vankova (2002) Caucasian (Česko) 38/22 PCR-RFLP PB NIH criteria Age, Weight 0.670
Powell (1) (2005) Caucasian (Britain) 185/1062 ARMS assay, Pyrosequencing PB Rotterdam criteria Age 0.321
Powell (2) (2005) Caucasian (Finland) 72/1069 ARMS assay, Pyrosequencing PB Ultrasound symptoms Age, BMI, Weight 0.564
Powell (3) (2005) Caucasian (Finland) 458/1069 ARMS assay, Pyrosequencing PB symptoms Age, BMI, Weight 0.564
Kadri (2007) Caucasian (Estonia) 30/75 PCR-RFLP HB Rotterdam criteria Age, BMI 0.182
P Perk (2008) Caucasian (Slovenia) 117/108 TaqMan assay PB Rotterdam criteria Age 0.811
Y-P Xu (2009) Asian (China) 216/192 PCR-RFLP HB Rotterdam criteria Age 0.982
Q-F Zhang (2010) Asian (China) 130/130 PCR-RFLP HB Rotterdam criteria NR 0.055
Zhen Liu (2011) Asian (China) 55/50 PCR-RFLP HB Rotterdam criteria Age 0.006
J-H Yun (2012) Asian (Korea) 218/141 PCR-RFLP HB Rotterdam criteria BMI,Weight 0.292
L. Skrgati (2013) Caucasian (Croatia) 150/170 TaqMan assay PB Rotterdam criteria Age, BMI 0.674

ARMS amplification refractory mutation system, PB population-base, HB hospital-base, FB family-base, NR not reported

Data in boldface represent P<0.05