Table 2.
Multilevel logistic regression analysis of criminal victimization: India Human Development Survey, 2004–2005
| Model 1 Theft |
Model 2 Breaking and Entering |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Variables | b | SE | ex | b | SE | ex |
| District Male-to-Female Sex Ratio Ages 15–39 | 0.014* | 0.006 | 1.014 | 0.020* | 0.008 | 1.020 |
| Household Characteristics | ||||||
| No. of household members | 0.019† | 0.011 | 1.019 | 0.005 | 0.022 | 1.005 |
| Household has member ages 15–21 | 0.065 | 0.056 | 1.067 | 0.164 | 0.104 | 1.178 |
| Household education | 0.007 | 0.006 | 1.007 | −0.018 | 0.012 | 0.982 |
| Household income (1,000s of rupees) | −0.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | −0.001 | 0.001 | 0.999 |
| Homeownership | 0.065 | 0.101 | 1.067 | 0.116 | 0.185 | 1.123 |
| Religion | ||||||
| Other religion (ref.) | ||||||
| Hindu | −0.142 | 0.130 | 0.868 | 0.039 | 0.239 | 1.040 |
| Muslim | −0.100 | 0.154 | 0.905 | −0.115 | 0.290 | 0.891 |
| Caste | ||||||
| Other caste/no caste (ref.) | ||||||
| Scheduled caste | 0.050 | 0.085 | 1.051 | 0.112 | 0.157 | 1.119 |
| Scheduled tribe | −0.003 | 0.132 | 0.997 | −0.253 | 0.244 | 0.776 |
| Other backward caste | −0.017 | 0.074 | 0.983 | 0.143 | 0.134 | 1.154 |
| Other District-Level Characteristics | ||||||
| Proportion urban | 0.278 | 0.190 | 1.320 | 0.062 | 0.269 | 1.064 |
| Mean household income | −0.003 | 0.003 | 0.997 | −0.001 | 0.005 | 0.999 |
| Proportion women with names on house papers | −0.078 | 0.420 | 0.925 | 1.105* | 0.532 | 3.019 |
| Proportion women with access to cash | −1.807** | 0.395 | 0.164 | −1.672** | 0.527 | 0.188 |
| Women’s participation in household decisions | −0.091 | 0.075 | 0.913 | −0.330** | 0.098 | 0.719 |
| Proportion women needing permission to visit family | 0.270 | 0.335 | 1.310 | 0.627 | 0.461 | 1.872 |
| Proportion women preferring boys receive more education than girls |
−0.917* | 0.370 | 0.400 | −2.382** | 0.736 | 0.092 |
| Collective efficacy | 0.416† | 0.247 | 1.516 | −0.116 | 0.337 | 0.890 |
| In-migration rate | −0.004 | 0.008 | 0.996 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 1.010 |
| Region | ||||||
| North (ref.) | ||||||
| South | −0.234 | 0.163 | 0.791 | 0.038 | 0.217 | 1.039 |
| East | 1.329** | 0.171 | 3.777 | 0.848** | 0.233 | 2.335 |
| Northeast | −0.009 | 0.313 | 0.991 | 0.892* | 0.385 | 2.440 |
| Constant | −4.082** | −5.629** | ||||
| N | 41,402 | 41,404 | ||||
| Log-Likelihood | –5,824.971 | –2,170.726 | ||||
| District Male-to-Female Sex Ratio Ages 15–39 | 0.019* | 0.010 | 1.019 | 0.035** | 0.010 | 1.036 |
| Household Characteristics | ||||||
| No. of household members | 0.031* | 0.014 | 1.031 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 1.002 |
| Household has member age 15–21 | 0.140* | 0.070 | 1.150 | 0.037 | 0.035 | 1.038 |
| Household education | −0.025** | 0.008 | 0.975 | −0.012** | 0.004 | 0.988 |
| Household income (1,000s of rupees) | −0.002* | 0.001 | 0.998 | −0.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| Homeownership | −0.116 | 0.131 | 0.890 | −0.041 | 0.059 | 0.960 |
| Religion | ||||||
| Other religion (ref.) | ||||||
| Hindu | −0.028 | 0.178 | 0.972 | 0.059 | 0.092 | 1.061 |
| Muslim | −0.141 | 0.210 | 0.868 | 0.243* | 0.107 | 1.275 |
| Caste | ||||||
| Other caste/no caste (ref.) | ||||||
| Scheduled caste | 0.271* | 0.112 | 1.311 | 0.188** | 0.055 | 1.207 |
| Scheduled tribe | 0.087 | 0.162 | 1.091 | 0.159† | 0.083 | 1.172 |
| Other backward caste | 0.140 | 0.098 | 1.150 | 0.049 | 0.047 | 1.050 |
| Other District-Level Characteristics | ||||||
| Proportion urban | −0.446 | 0.306 | 0.640 | 0.177 | 0.291 | 1.194 |
| Mean household income | −0.007 | 0.005 | 0.993 | −0.007 | 0.005 | 0.993 |
| Proportion women with names on house papers | −0.238 | 0.648 | 0.788 | 2.501** | 0.621 | 12.195 |
| Proportion women with access to cash | −0.365 | 0.637 | 0.694 | −1.683* | 0.660 | 0.186 |
| Women’s participation in household decisions | −0.022 | 0.116 | 0.978 | 0.046 | 0.125 | 1.047 |
| Proportion women needing permission to visit family | 1.236* | 0.523 | 3.442 | 0.048 | 0.508 | 1.049 |
| Proportion women preferring boys receive more education than girls |
−0.875 | 0.576 | 0.417 | 0.095 | 0.284 | 1.100 |
| Collective efficacy | −0.703† | 0.381 | 0.495 | −1.881** | 0.382 | 0.152 |
| In-migration rate | −0.010 | 0.013 | 0.990 | −0.007 | 0.013 | 0.993 |
| Region | ||||||
| North (ref.) | ||||||
| South | −0.045 | 0.249 | 0.956 | 1.109** | 0.250 | 3.031 |
| East | 1.132** | 0.268 | 3.102 | 0.571† | 0.294 | 1.770 |
| Northeast | 0.645 | 0.468 | 1.906 | 3.130** | 0.456 | 22.874 |
| Constant | –6.329** | –4.444** | ||||
| N | 41,401 | 32,643 | ||||
| Log-Likelihood | –3,921.270 | –11,504.455 | ||||
Note: All models include a random intercept for district (n = 382).
p < .10;
p < .05;
p < .01