Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jun;45(6):519–527. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1138

Table III.

Fit indices of the AMAT-9

Item Location Standard error Item Fit residuals Degrees of freedom χ2 Probability
5) ‘Sandwich’ to mouth −5.747 1.012 −0.123 23.75 0.178 0.914
3) Fork to mouth −3.145 0.534 −0.229 23.75 0.339 0.844
11) Grasp jar top −2.228 0.513 −0.007 23.75 1.190 0.551
8) Spoon to mouth −2.027 0.513 −0.153 23.75 0.830 0.660
12) unscrew jar top −1.951 0.513 −0.372 23.75 1.171 0.556
10) comb hair −1.448 0.518 −0.243 23.75 0.198 0.905
4) Pick up foam ‘sandwich’ −1.151 0.525 −0.458 23.75 0.375 0.828
14) Phone receive to ear −0.997 0.530 −0.921 23.75 1.047 0.592
13) Tie shoelace −0.610 0.547 −0.428 23.75 0.727 0.695
6) Pick up spoon −0.234 0.569 −0.410 23.75 0.420 0.810
7) Pick up bean w spoon 0.402 0.623 −1.133 23.75 4.498 0.105
18) dress affected arm in t–shirt 0.421 0.625 0.179 23.75 1.633 0.441
16) dress affected arm in sweater 0.885 0.675 0.165 23.75 0.357 0.836
2) cut meat 0.987 0.686 −0.058 23.75 0.288 0.865
15) dial phone number 1.186 0.709 −0.560 23.75 0.286 0.866
9) Pick up comb 1.441 0.739 −0.022 23.75 1.033 0.596
1) Pick up knife and fork 2.631 0.876 −0.407 23.75 0.543 0.762
17) Button two lower buttons 3.055 0.932 −0.156 23.75 0.135 0.934
20) Pull down and straighten 4.086 1.143 −0.205 23.75 0.046 0.977
19) Head through hole 4.443 1.260 −0.210 23.75 0.113 0.944

All items showed Fit residual values < 2.5 and Bonferroni adjusted probability scores > 0.001.