Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 1;3(6):438–444. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0521

Table 1.

Volumes of eight different surgical siti were determined with three different methods creating four different calculations

Operation Site Mold Filling [cm3] Tetrahedron Approximation [cm3] Semiellipsoid Approximation [cm3] TOF [cm3] Correlation Between Manual Measurement and TOF (p-Value)
1 100 163±11 (6.5%) 171±11 (6.5%) 125±6 (5.2%) r=0.020 (0.917)
2 110 198±16 (8.3%) 207±17 (8.3%) 104±7 (7.0%) r=−0.512 (0.004)
3 150 136±13 (9.2%) 143±13 (9.2%) 73±9 (12.5%) r=−0.006 (0.976)
4 150 215±16 (7.3%) 225±16 (7.3%) 67±10 (14.4%) r=−0.280 (0.134)
5 173 496±63 (12.7%) 519±66 (12.7%) 164±28 (17.3%) r=− 0.399 (0.029)
6 180 212±7 (3.4%) 222±8 (3.4%) 135±36 (26.7%) r=0.439 (0.015)
7 200 226±10 (4.4%) 236±10 (4.4%) 118±35 (29.6%) r=−0.459 (0.011)
8 220 341±13 (3.9%) 357±14 (3.9%) 186±36 (19.5%) r=−0.144 (0.448)

Mean and standard deviation of all measurements, as well as data variability (in brackets) are shown for each method and each site.

TOF, time-of-flight.