Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 17;69(4):579–589. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu032

Table 2.

Regression Analysis Predicting Global Marital Satisfaction With Profiles

Variable B SE β p Runique2 Rtotal2
Model 1: Males .57
 Positive 0.81 0.06 .65 .00 .37
 Positive–Negative 0.29 0.05 .23 .00 .05
 Negative −0.14 0.05 −.11 .007 .01
Model 2: Females .63
 Positive 1.17 0.04 .75 .00 .48
 Positive–Negative 0.26 0.03 .17 .00 .02
 Negative −0.05 0.03 −.03 .14 .00

Notes. Runique2: Variance explained by specific predictor variable independent from all other predictors. Control variables included in both models were age (men: B = 0.02, SE = 0.01, β = .07, p = .12; women: B = 0.00, SE = 0.01, β = −.01, p = .59), depressive symptoms (men: B = −0.12, SE = 0.06, β = −.09, p = .05; women: B = −0.10, SE = 0.04, β = −.07, p = .007), subjective health (men: B = −0.05, SE = 0.05, β = −.04, p = .34; women: B = 0.01, SE = 0.03, β = .01, p = .74).