Skip to main content
. 2014 May;28(5):251–274. doi: 10.1155/2014/262816

TABLE 4.

Quality recommendations found in the review of existing guidelines

Organization, year (reference) Cecal intubation rate Recommendations WT (without polypectomy or biopsy)

Screening Symptomatic ADR PR
PEBC, 2007 (7) 95% provided adequate preparation and no structural abnormalities No recommendations None None No recommendation
ASGE/ACG, 2007 (27) 95% 90% Screening patients >50 years of age: 25% men 15% women None ≥6 min
CAG, 2008 (14) 95% 85%–90% Screening in healthy asymptomatic patients >50 years: 25% men; 15% women None >7 min
European Commission, 2010 (8) >90% acceptable, >95% desirable None None No WT given, but recommended as an outcome to be monitored
National Bowel Cancer Screening Program UK, 2011 (9) 90% with no adjustment for poor bowel preparation or structural lesions ≥35% in context of an FOBT-based screening program None None ≥6 min
National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Australia, 2009 (2) 95% 90% >20% in patients >50 years of age for initial colonoscopy None ≥6 min

ADR Adenoma detection rate; ASGE/ACG American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/American College of Gastroenterologists; CAG Canadian Association for Gastroenterology; FOBT Fecal occult blood test; PEBC Program in Evidence-Based Care; PR Polypectomy rate; UK United Kingdom; WT Withdrawal time