Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 9;9(6):e99151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099151

Table 2. Model comparisons with unconstrained size correlation versus natural, log and logistic scaled and model reductions according to either species or year.

Model or Structure of correlation Tot Df Deviance Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq)
Model comparison, cod year 2009 quarter 4
(SS1) Unconstrained 993 −122858.25
(SS2) Natural 6 −122607.85 250.40 987 1.000
(SS3) Log 6 −122700.71 157.54 987 1.000
(SS4) Logistic 8 −122693.00 165.25 985 1.000
Model comparison, cod year 2010 quarter 4
(SS1) Unconstrained 993 −133760.09
(SS2) Natural 6 −133241.87 518.22 987 1.000
(SS3) Log 6 −133336.41 423.68 987 1.000
(SS4) Logistic 8 −133325.86 434.23 985 1.000
Model reduction: cod+whiting year 2009 quarter 4 by structure of species correlation
(MS1) Unconstrained species correlation 1451 −226997.63
(MS2) Common correlation function 1449 −226984.52 13.11 2 <0.010
(MS3) Separable 10 −226433.58 550.94 1439 1.000
(MS4) Independence 9 −226430.51 3.08 1 0.079
Model reduction: cod year 2009+2010 quarter 4 by structure of year correlation
(MY1) Unconstrained year correlation 2036 −256427.46
(MY2) Common correlation function 2034 −256423.99 3.47 2 0.176
(MY3) Separable 10 −256055.89 368.10 2024 1.000
(MY4) Independence 9 −256028.29 27.59 1 0.000