Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 11;15(6):735–741. doi: 10.4161/cbt.28408

Table 2. Gene expression correlation analysis.

ZFP57 GII vs CPT1A GII Sample size 46
r coefficient 0.7
Mean x (xˉ) 9.13
Mean y (yˉ) 27.52
Intercept (a) 22.16
Slope (b) 0.59
Regression line equation y = 22.16 + 0.59x
ZFP57 GIV vs CPT1A GIV Sample size 34
r coefficient 0.65
Mean x (xˉ) 37.64
Mean y (yˉ) 59.65
Intercept (a) 40.50
Slope (b) 0.51
Regression line equation y = 40.50 + 0.51x
CPT1A GII vs CPT1C GII Sample size 46
r coefficient −0.16
Mean x (xˉ) 27.52
Mean y (yˉ) 30.67
Intercept (a) 36.18
Slope (b) −0.2
Regression line equation y = 36.18 − 0.20x
CPT1A GIV vs CPT1C GIV Sample size 34
r coefficient −0.71
Mean x (xˉ) 59.65
Mean y (yˉ) 15.24
Intercept (a) 36.72
Slope (b) −0.36
Regression line equation y = 36.72 − 0.36x
ZFP57 GII vs CPT1C GII Sample size 46
r coefficient 0.05
Mean x (xˉ) 9.13
Mean y (yˉ) 30.67
Intercept (a) 30.1
Slope (b) 0.01
Regression line equation y = 30.10 + 0.01x
ZFP57 GIV vs CPT1C GIV Sample size 34
r coefficient −0.75
Mean x (xˉ) 37.64
Mean y (yˉ) 15.24
Intercept (a) 26.31
Slope (b) −0.29
Regression line equation y = 26.31 − 0.29x
ZFP57 GII vs PTEN GII Sample size 46
r coefficient 0.24
Mean x (xˉ) 9.13
Mean y (yˉ) 31.35
Intercept (a) 27.78
Slope (b) 0.38
Regression line equation y = 27.78 + 0.38x
ZFP57 GIV vs PTEN GIV Sample size 34
r coefficient −0.68
Mean x (xˉ) 37.64
Mean y (yˉ) 26.08
Intercept (a) 44.16
Slope (b) −0.48
Regression line equation y = 44.15 – 0.48x
CPT1A GII vs PTEN GII Sample size 46
r coefficient 0.31
Mean x (xˉ) 27.52
Mean y (yˉ) 31.35
Intercept (a) 14.99
Slope (b) 0.60
Regression line equation y = 14.99 + 0.60x
CPT1A GIV vs PTEN GIV Sample size 34
r coefficient −0.71
Mean x (xˉ) 59.65
Mean y (yˉ) 26.08
Intercept (a) 64.64
Slope (b) −0.64
Regression line equation y = 64.64 – 0.64x
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure