Table 4.
Logistic regression models of drinking profiles and sociodemographic variables on negative alcohol-related consequences (n = 2620).
| OR (95% CI) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|
| SEVERE NEGATIVE ALCOHOL-RELATED CONSEQUENCES (SAC) | ||
| Drinking profilesa | ||
| LL | 1.00 | |
| NH | 0.83 (0.68–1.01) | 0.062 |
| PH | 1.79 (1.45–2.21) | <0.001 |
| HH | 1.94 (1.40–2.69) | <0.001 |
| RSODb | ||
| Monthly | 1.00 | |
| Weekly | 1.61 (1.35–1.93) | <0.001 |
| Daily | 2.74 (1.54–4.87) | 0.001 |
| Drinking volume (standard drinks per week) | 1.01 (1.00–1.02) | 0.043 |
| Age | 1.03 (0.87–1.23) | 0.702 |
| Residence | ||
| Rural | 1.00 | |
| Urban | 1.16 (0.98–1.38) | 0.087 |
| Linguistic region | ||
| German | 1.00 | |
| French | 1.06 (0.88–1.26) | 0.543 |
| Family affluence | ||
| Above average income | 1.00 | |
| Average income | 1.03 (0.80–1.34) | 0.810 |
| Below average income | 0.93 (0.72–1.20) | 0.564 |
| Education participant | ||
| Primary school | 1.00 | |
| Higher vocational school | 1.11 (0.89–1.39) | 0.346 |
| High school/university | 1.20 (0.94–1.51) | 0.140 |
| Education father | ||
| No secondary education | 1.00 | |
| Secondary education | 1.13 (0.81–1.57) | 0.472 |
| Tertiary education | 0.97 (0.81–1.16) | 0.712 |
aLL, participants with low to intermediate factor scores for both dimensions; NH, participants with high factor scores for the non-party-dimension only; PH, participants with high factor scores for the party-dimension only; HH, participants with high factor scores for both dimensions.
bRSOD, risky single-occasion drinking.