Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2014 Mar 29;129(20):2005–2012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008643

Table 1.

Agreement between empirical and physician-assigned risk assessment for stroke and bleeding.

Stroke Risk Bleeding Risk
Physician
Stroke
Assessment
CHADS2 = 0
(n=644)
CHADS2 = 1
(n=2199)
CHADS2 ≥2
(n=7251)
Physician
Bleeding
Assessment
ATRIA ≤3
(n=7440)
ATRIA = 4
(n=905)
ATRIA ≥5
(n=1749)
Low (<3%) (n=4173) 78% 62% 32% Low (<3%) (n=5982) 63% 58% 44%
Intermediate (3-6%) (n=4296) 19% 33% 48% Intermediate (3-6%) (n=3393) 31% 33% 43%
High (> 6%) (n=1625) 3% 5% 21% High (>6%) (n=719) 6% 9% 13%

Agreement between empirical risk score, and physician-assigned assessment (column percentages).