Table 1.
Study | n | PBRM1 | SETD2 |
SETD2/ PBRM1 |
Expected Double mutants |
p value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sanger Institute (16, 18) | 348 | 111 | 7 | 8 | 5 (2–8) | 0.16 | 2.3 (0.8 – 6.5) |
Guo et al. (17) | 98 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 1 (0–2) | 0.03 | 12.7 (1.2 – 129) |
Hakimiet al. (29) | 185 | 48 | 8 | 6 | 4 (2–7) | 0.24 | 1.9 (0.6 – 5.8) |
TCGA | 293 | 90 | 17 | 16 | 12 (7–14) | 0.13 | 1.8 (0.9 – 3.7) |
Total | 924 | 267 | 33 | 33 | 21 (17–25) | 0.003 | 2.1 (1.3 – 3.5) |
Number of tumors with specific mutations and expected frequencies. The range of expected double mutants was calculated based on a hypergeometric distribution. Differences between actual and expected values were evaluated with a Fisher’s exact test. The Mantel-Haenszel test was used to integrate odds ratios from the different studies. KIRC TCGA data obtained from January, 2013 release. Data from the combination of these studies (the total) are highlighted in bold. Significant P values are also in bold.