Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2013 Jul 5;73(14):4173–4179. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0360

Table 1.

Cooperativity between SETD2 and PBRM1 in ccRCC.

Study n PBRM1 SETD2 SETD2/
PBRM1
Expected
Double
mutants
p value Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
Sanger Institute (16, 18) 348 111 7 8 5 (2–8) 0.16 2.3 (0.8 – 6.5)
Guo et al. (17) 98 18 1 3 1 (0–2) 0.03 12.7 (1.2 – 129)
Hakimiet al. (29) 185 48 8 6 4 (2–7) 0.24 1.9 (0.6 – 5.8)
TCGA 293 90 17 16 12 (7–14) 0.13 1.8 (0.9 – 3.7)
Total 924 267 33 33 21 (17–25) 0.003 2.1 (1.3 – 3.5)

Number of tumors with specific mutations and expected frequencies. The range of expected double mutants was calculated based on a hypergeometric distribution. Differences between actual and expected values were evaluated with a Fisher’s exact test. The Mantel-Haenszel test was used to integrate odds ratios from the different studies. KIRC TCGA data obtained from January, 2013 release. Data from the combination of these studies (the total) are highlighted in bold. Significant P values are also in bold.