Table 3.
Description | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
---|---|---|---|
ED (%) | 51.6 (13.3) | 69.0 (0.6) | 55.6 (5.7) |
Capsule (%) | 26.1 (15.9) | 7.8 (0.1) | 19.5 (8.5) |
CC (%)* | 3.1 (0.4) | 0.7 (0.1)** | 3.4 (1.1) |
Flow passage (%) | 7.1 (2.0) | 8.4 (0.3) | 9.7 (1.7) |
Connecting tubing (13 cm) (%) | 10.1 (0.7) | 11.5 (0.3) | 9.8 (3.0) |
ECG Cannula (%) | 1.9 (0.3) | 2.5 (0.2) | 1.9 (0.5) |
FPF<5μm/ED (%) | 80.0 (7.3) | 73.2 (6.0) | 82.9 (1.7) |
FPF<1μm/ED (%)* | 23.8 (2.8) | 19.5 (3.1) | 27.4 (3.0) |
MMAD (μm) | 1.89 (0.24) | 2.20 (0.26) | 1.71 (0.09) |
P<0.05 significant effect of piercing configuration on % CC drug retention and FPF<1μm/ED (one-way ANOVA).
P<0.05 significant effect compared to Case 1 (post-hoc Tukey).