Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2014 Jan 3;136(2):741–749. doi: 10.1021/ja410824x

Table 1. Fold Stability and Arrhenius Plot Dynamics Data Comparisons a.

Fold Stability Arrhenius plot dynamics parameters
Slope (J/mol) 300 K 310 K 320 K
ΔGU 310K folding unfolding 1/kF (μs) 1/kU (μs) 1/kF (μs) 1/kU (μs) 1/kF (μs) 1/kU (μs)
WW st29 -10.8 -161 1277 8.1 b 8.9 230.3
stHP1 DRGSGR-turn -6.5 899 1574 63.1 1742 27.7 445 12.6 95.5
DPATGR-turn -8.7 363 742 2.4 69.8 2.0 40.0
WW cp29 -6.0 -663 671 11 b 21 213 49.3 172.7
cpHP1 DRGSGK-turn -1.75 531 c 1188 39.3 132 30.1 59.6 16.2 18.4
NPATGK-turn -5.4 329 857 6.4 76.8 4.5 36.5 3.7 17.1
 IpGK-turn -7.0 889 1551 7.1 213 3.2 55.2 1.4 12.9
BLB30 (n=3) +0.62 372 865 112 162 92 72
a

The rate data at 320K provides the most complete comparison over all constructs; the rates shown are the averages over all available probes. Arrhenius inverse-log plot slopes are an average over all probes for each construct. In the case of the unfolding rates, all species display strict linearity within experimental error. There is some curvature suggested by the folding rate data for the DPATGR turn mutant of stHP1 and the NPATGK turn mutant of cpHP1.

b

Extrapolated folding rates based on the linear fit equation for ln k vs 1/T.

c

This is the clearest case of a curved ln k vs 1/T plot. The slopes at 300 and 320 K are: 80 and 450 J/mol, respectively.