Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Apr;91(4):383–389. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000223

Table 3.

Association of bilateral hyperopia with bilateral amblyopia and strabismus (N=4040).

Bilateral Amblyopia (N=234) Strabismus (N=157)

Bilateral Hyperopia
(No/Yes)
N§ n
(%)
OR
(95% CI)
P* n
(%)
OR
(95% CI)
P*
No 3724 162(4.4%) 1.0 94(2.5%) 1.0

Yes 308 72(23.4%) 6.7(4.9,9.1) <0.0001 63(20.5%) 10.0(7.1,14.1) <0.0001
Group 1 134 40(29.9%) 9.4(6.3,14.0) <0.0001 49(36.8%) 22.5(15.0,33.9) <0.0001
Group 2 71 15(21.1%) 5.9(3.3,10.6) <0.0001 7(9.9%) 4.2(1.9,9.5) 0.0005
Group 3 103 17(16.5%) 4.3(2.5,7.5) <0.0001 7(6.8%) 2.8(1.3,6.2) 0.011

Trend p-value£ 0.02 <0.0001

D = Diopter; OR = Odds Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval.

*

P value is from logistic regression model.

£

For comparison among Groups 1, 2, 3 using Cochran-Armitage trend test.

Bilateral hyperopia was defined as most positive meridian >+3.25 D in both eyes.

Bilateral amblyopia was defined as best-corrected VA <20/50 in each eye for 3-year-olds, best-corrected VA <20/40 in each eye for 4- to 5-year-olds.

§

8 children with missing data for VA were excluded.