Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Feb;57(1):172–186. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0388)

Table 3.

Comparison of pre- to post-treatment change scores across treatment conditions, adjusted for pre-test score.

Variable Score Type NCP English Bilingual Control p η2
ROW-E Std 2.22 1.97 4.94 −0.02 0.269
Raw 3.67 2.26 7.29 1.47 0.275
EOW-E Std 2.21 7.11 4.41 4.11 0.108
Raw 4.60 9.89 5.99 6.35 0.181
CELF-E Std 3.91 6.75 6.66 0.88 0.117
Raw 8.44 16.71 15.97 3.41 0.004 0.103
NWR-E 0.10 2.30 9.00 −1.80 0.122

ROW-S Std 1.86 −0.16 1.88 XX 0.901
Raw 0.72 −0.29 8.20 XX 0.322
EOW-S Std 1.46 4.87 4.72 XX 0.626
Raw 2.41 2.84 6.51 XX 0.213
CELF-S Std −0.17 2.63 2.16 0.88 0.560
Raw 3.05 7.19 5.03 4.96 0.773
NWR-S 9.10 1.50 2.80 −1.00 0.185

CVD 74.82 51.94 −37.93 19.81 0.004 0.129
SSA 0.40 0.48 0.51 0.49 0.971
ASM 0.35 0.71 0.40 0.48 0.821

Note. Table displays the mean change score (i.e., post-test score minus pre-test score) for each group and outcome measure, with the pre-test score for that measure co-varied out. For standardized language tests, both standard and raw score changes are listed. The control group was omitted from the ROW-S and EOW-S analyses due to small group size for those variables. P values indicate the significance of the ANCOVA analysis comparing the four groups’ change scores. See Table 1 Note for descriptions of variables and a list of abbreviations.