Table 2.
Features used as criteria in the calculation of reproducibility quotient.
| Figure 2 |
| G–K: 82/101 hPEDs underwent the transition from preprocambium to procambium (as defined in text) during the imaging interval |
| Figure 3 |
| A–J: Out of 44 extending hPEDs, in 35 cases extension was due to terminal addition |
| Figure 4 |
| A,B: 29/209 PEDs formed side branches while still freely ending |
| C–E: 92/209 hPEDs observed were initially >2 cells wide and narrowed to domains 1–2 cells wide during the imaging interval |
| K–O: 4/48 connected hPEDs observed were formed via the fusion of two freely-ending hPEDs |
| Figure 5 |
| A: Strong DR5rev::VENUS expression was present in 45 out of 45 apical CPs observed |
| B–F: DR5rev::VENUS expression was absent from 23 out of 23 first loop-associated lateral CPs |
| G,H: DR5rev::VENUS expression was present in 17 out of 23 second loop-associated lateral CPs |
| J–K: DR5rev::VENUS expression was present in 17 out of 19 second loop-associated lateral CPs |
| Figure 6 |
| F–G: 21/48 connected hPEDs observed were formed via the fusion of a freely-ending hPED with a static PED. |
| H–I: 39/298 hPEDs observed exhibited loss of PIN1 expression in domains of 3 cells or more |
| K–O: 4/48 connected hPEDs observed were formed via the fusion of two freely-ending hPEDs |
| P–T: 39/298 hPEDs observed exhibited loss of PIN1 expression in domains of 3 cells or more |
| Figure 7 |
| A,F: In 331/358 hPEDs, axialized cells with high PIN1 expression expressed Athb8::YFPer, while polygonal cells with low PIN1 expression did not |
| L,Q,Y: In 24/25 hPEDs, Athb8 was not expressed in edge cells with centrobasal PIN1 polarity that disappear |
| N,S,Z: In 42/42 hPEDs, Athb8 was expressed in central cells with basal PIN1 polarity that persist |
| U,W: Out of 73 hPEDs that showed differences in Athb8::YFPer expression along the strand, 59 hPEDs exhibited stronger Athb8 expression in cells at the base of the hPED vs. cells at the free end |