Skip to main content
. 2014 May 16;14:220. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-220

Table 3.

Patient satisfaction and experiences with care following multivariate regression to control for various demographic, socioeconomic and health status differences

  BMI category Odds ratio estimate a Lower C.I. Upper C.I. p-value
Global ratings (Satisfaction)
 
 
 
 
 
Global satisfaction rating for personal doctor
Underweight
0.84
0.73
0.96
0.01
Overweight
1.03
0.98
1.09
0.23
Obese
1.22
1.13
1.31
<0.0001
Global satisfaction rating for specialist (9 or higher out of 10)
Underweight
0.98
0.83
1.16
0.81
Overweight
1.02
0.96
1.08
0.61
Obese
1.13
1.04
1.23
<0.01
Global satisfaction rating for all health care (9 or higher out of 10)
Underweight
1.03
0.91
1.16
0.66
Overweight
1.06
1.01
1.11
0.01
Obesity
1.19
1.12
1.27
<0.0001
Global satisfaction rating for AARP supplement insurance (9 or higher out of 10)
Underweight
0.98
0.86
1.11
0.74
Overweight
1.01
0.96
1.05
0.76
Obese
1.09
1.02
1.16
0.01
Composite ratings (Experiences with care)
 
 
 
 
 
Personal doctor communication: Personal doctor explained things in a way that was easy to understand, listen carefully to you, show respect for what you had to say, and spend enough time with you
Underweight
0.88
0.77
1.01
0.07
Overweight
1.06
1.01
1.11
0.03
Obese
1.21
1.13
1.29
<0.0001
Chronic condition management: Personal doctor gave clear instructions about how to manage your health condition, and work with you to set personal goals for managing your health condition
Underweight
0.93
0.80
1.07
0.29
Overweight
0.89
0.85
0.94
<0.0001
Obese
0.97
0.91
1.04
0.41
Composite patient experience scores for care coordination is 90 or higher out of 100
Underweight
0.95
0.83
1.09
0.44
Overweight
1.08
1.03
1.14
0.001
Obese
1.2
1.12
1.28
<0.0001
Composite patient experience scores for access to the care is 90 or higher out of 100 Underweight
0.9
0.79
1.03
0.13
Overweight
1.04
0.99
1.09
0.11
Obese 1.12 1.06 1.20 <0.001

aRelative to normal weight. Results of the main outcome measures are after adjustment for survey non-response bias and regression analysis as indicated in Table 2.