Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Phon. 2014 May 17;45:91–105. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.04.002

Table 4.

Overall analyses in Experiment 2, the different-phoneme-same-cue experiment, for the condition in which participants saw the speaker produce the ambiguous sound in the context of a_a, and the context of aNa. The grey bar highlights the relevant interactions between Exposure place of articulation (labial-alveolar) and Trial Type (recalibration control - generalization).

aba-ada exposure
ama-ana exposure
factor
b
SE
Z
p
b
SE
z
p
(Intercept) −0.06 0.16 −0.39 .7 0.79 0.42 1.87 .061
Continuum −2.64 0.32 −8.26 <.001 −2.83 0.29 −9.81 <.001
POA 0.47 0.14 3.40 <.001 0.82 0.29 2.84 <.005
TrialType 0.5 0.41 1.20 .23 −0.21 0.83 −0.26 .8
Continuum:POA −0.12 0.23 −0.51 .61 −0.26 0.27 −0.96 .34
Continuum:TrialType −0.51 0.20 −2.47 <.05 1.71 0.42 4.05 <.001
POA:TrialType 0.7 0.30 2.32 <.05 1.15 0.37 3.07 <.005
Continuum:POA:TrialType −0.76 0.56 −1.35 0.18 0.10 0.46 0.22 .83