Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2010 Jul 9;72(4):947–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00741.x

Table 5.

Binary and Multinomial Logistic Regression Results: Interaction Between Household Generational Structure and Poverty (N = 8,861)

Health Insecurity
Public vs. Private Uninsured vs. Private Housing Insecurity Food Insecurity
Living arrangements
 Three generation .606* .508 −.483* −.014
 Skipped generation .470 .760** −.291 −.358
 Single parent
  (Two parent)
.124 −.069 −.460** .068
Not Poor −2.079*** −1.276*** −1.089*** −1.491***
Interactions
 Three generation × Not poor 1.880*** 1.091*** .816** .478
 Skipped generation × Not poor 1.850*** .865* −.273 .364
 Single parent × Not poor
  (Two parent × Not poor)
.345 .542*** .448** .314
Constant −1.801*** −1.768*** −2.140*** −2.702***
Pseudo R2 .239 .239 .136 .161

Note: Models control for child’s age and race/ethnicity; caregiver age, education, and gender and marital status; household size; and caregiver labor force participation and disability (omitted from table).

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.