Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 12;14(6):R145. doi: 10.1186/bcr3354

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis for prognostic significance: parameters in the final Cox model.

Overall survival HR 95% CI Wald's P
Histological grade
  III-IV versus I-II 1.94 1.21-3.11 0.006
Number of positive nodes
  ≥4 versus 0 to 3 2.58 1.32-5.02 0.005
Adjuvant HT
  No versus Yes 2.86 1.56-5.26 0.001
VEGF-B
  Continuous mRNA values 0.82 0.69-0.97 0.019
VEGF-C/Treatment group Interaction 3.84 1.24-11.84 0.019
Treatment group
 E-CMF versus E-T-CMF for VEGF-C low 0.96 0.54-1.70 0.885
 E-CMF versus E-T-CMF for VEGF-C high 3.68 1.38-9.80 0.009
VEGF-C
 High versus Low for E-T-CMF 0.74 0.28-1.96 0.547
 High versus Low for E-CMF 2.85 1.55-5.22 <0.001

Disease-free survival HR 95% CI Wald's P

Histological grade
  III-IV versus I-II 1.83 1.24-2.71 0.002
Number of positive nodes
  ≥4 versus 0 to 3 2.80 1.58-4.95 <0.001
Adjuvant HT
  No versus Yes 2.16 1.22-3.84 0.008
VEGF-B
  Continuous mRNA values 0.86 0.72-1.02 0.084
VEGFR1
  High versus Low 1.58 0.98-2.55 0.060
VEGF-C/Treatment group Interaction 2.56 1.04-6.31 0.041
Treatment group
 E-CMF versus E-T-CMF for VEGF-C low 0.95 0.60-1.52 0.846
 E-CMF versus E-T-CMF for VEGF-C high 2.44 1.12-5.31 0.057
VEGF-C
 High versus Low for E-T-CMF 0.68 0.31-1.48 0.327
 High versus Low for E-CMF 1.73 0.98-3.08 0.166

CI, confidence interval; CMF, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil; HR, hazard ratio; HT, hormonal therapy; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.