Skip to main content
. 2014 May 23;9:96. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-96

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of the XPC polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk

Comparison
Population
No. of studies
Test of association
Mode
Test of heterogeneity
      OR 95% CI P Value   χ 2 P Q Value I 2
Lys939Gln
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gln/Gln vs. Lys/lys
Overall
5
1.123
0.881-1.431
0.349
F
2.69
0.612
0.0
 
Caucasian
2
1.016
0.490-2.109
0.965
F
2.31
0.128
46.8
 
Asian
3
1.140
0.857-1.516
0.368
F
0.34
0.843
0.0
 
PB
2
1.260
0.877-1.810
0.212
F
0.24
0.623
0.0
 
HB
3
1.026
0.741-1.420
0.879
F
1.76
0.414
0.0
 
High quality
3
1.179
0.860-1.616
0.308
F
0.75
0.686
0.0
 
Low quality
2
1.048
0.718-1.530
0.807
F
1.71
0.191
41.6
Gln/Lys vs. Lys/lys
Overall
5
1.083
0.917-1.277
0.347
F
1.21
0.876
0.0
 
Caucasian
2
0.993
0.689-1.432
0.972
F
0.87
0.352
0.0
 
Asian
3
1.107
0.919-1.332
0.284
F
0.08
0.962
0.0
 
PB
2
1.026
0.795-1.324
0.846
F
0.64
0.424
0.0
 
HB
3
1.126
0.906-1.400
0.285
F
0.27
0.872
0.0
 
High quality
3
1.062
0.855-1.319
0.587
F
0.90
0.639
0.0
 
Low quality
2
1.112
0.861-1.437
0.417
F
0.24
0.628
0.0
Gln/Gln + Gln/Lys vs. Lys/lys
Overall
5
1.092
0.933-1.277
0.273
F
0.24
0.994
0.0
 
Caucasian
2
1.015
0.720-1.430
0.933
F
0.01
0.906
0.0
 
Asian
3
1.113
0.933-1.327
0.235
F
0.00
0.998
0.0
 
PB
2
1.076
0.846-1.369
0.551
F
0.18
0.667
0.0
 
HB
3
1.103
0.897-1.356
0.351
F
0.03
0.986
0.0
 
High quality
3
1.087
0.886-1.333
0.424
F
0.21
0.900
0.0
 
Low quality
2
1.098
0.860-1.401
0.453
F
0.02
0.881
0.0
Gln/Gln vs. Gln/Lys + Lys/lys
Overall
5
1.046
0.838-1.307
0.691
F
6.57
0.160
39.2
 
Caucasian
2
0.921
0.344-2.468
0.870
F
5.98
0.114
43.3
 
Asian
3
1.083
0.829-1.417
0.558
F
0.47
0.791
0.0
 
PB
2
1.253
0.896-1.751
0.187
F
0.77
0.381
0.0
 
HB
3
0.914
0.680-1.229
0.552
F
3.90
0.142
48.8
 
High quality
3
1.157
0.862-1.553
0.331
F
1.66
0.435
0.0
 
Low quality
2
0.828
0.400-1.712
0.610
F
3.90
0.148
44.3
Ala499Val
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Val/Val vs. Ala/Ala
Asian
3
0.861
0.632-1.172
0.341
F
0.57
0.754
0.0
Val/Ala vs. Ala/Ala
Asian
3
0.815
0.611-1.089
0.167
F
4.72
0.194
37.6
Val/Val + Val/Ala vs. Ala/Ala
Asian
3
0.823
0.630-1.076
0.155
F
4.49
0.106
35.5
Val/Val vs. Val/Ala + Ala/Ala
Asian
3
0.947
0.703-1.274
0.717
F
0.04
0.981
0.0
PAT−/+
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
+/+vs. −/−
Overall
2
1.035
0.763-1.404
0.825
F
0.12
0.726
0.0
+/− vs. −/−
Overall
2
0.855
0.681-1.073
0.176
F
0.00
0.975
0.0
(+/+) + (+/−) vs. (−/−)
Overall
2
0.896
0.724-1.111
0.317
F
0.05
0.830
0.0
(+/+) vs. (+/−) + (−/−) Overall 2 1.141 0.871-1.495 0.338 F 0.20 0.652 0.0

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals; R, random effects model; F, fixed effects model; PB, Population–based; HB, Hospital–based.