Table 2. Results of three-way ANOVAs performed on individual subjects’ single-channel MDT data.

Subject	Stimulation level				Modulation frequency				Stimulation site
	dF, res	F	p	Post-hoc p<0.05	dF, res	F	p	Post-hoc p<0.05	dF, res	F	p	Post-hoc p<0.05
S1	1, 3	65	0.004	50 LL>25 LL	1, 3	304	<0.001	10 Hz>100 Hz	3,3	25	0.012	A,B>C
S2	1, 3	134	<0.001	50 LL>25 LL	1, 3	10	0.052		3,3	2	0.29
S3	1, 3	26	0.015	50 LL>25 LL	1, 3	113	0.002	10 Hz>100 Hz	3,3	10	0.044
S4	1, 3	278	<0.001	50 L>25 LL	1, 3	634	<0.001	10 Hz>100 Hz	3,3	41	0.006	A,B>C, D
S5	1, 3	213	<0.001	50 LL>25 LL	1, 3	47	0.006	10 Hz>100 Hz	3,3	8	0.058
S6	1, 3	220	<0.001	50 L>25 LL	1, 3	166	<0.001	10 Hz>100 Hz	3,3	27	0.011	A>D
S7	1, 3	54	0.005	50 LL>25 LL	1, 3	10	0.049	10 Hz>100 Hz	3,3	5	0.103
S8	1, 3	22	0.019	50 LL>25 LL	1, 3	143	0.001	10 Hz>100 Hz	3,3	17	0.021	A>C
S9	1, 3	256	<0.001	50 LL>25 LL	1, 3	94	0.002	10 Hz>100 Hz	3,3	58	0.004	A>B, A,D>C

dF = degrees of freedom; res = residual error; F = F-ratio.