Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099759

Table 1. Evaluations of the molecular models generated for PPOs [23], [32], [34].

protein model PPO-1 PPO-2 PPO-6 PPO-7
sequence identity [%] compared to the template 58 59 50 53
RMSD [Å] of the generated modela 0.492 0.544 0.601 0.538
starting amino acid for modeling D95 D92 D90 A89
ending amino acid for modeling Y424 Y421 Y430 Y433
KoBa potential energy [kcal/mol] −6259 −6548 −5555 −7160
Clash scoreb 8.29 5.93 10.9 9.15
Outliersc [%] 0.30 1.22 1.99 2.62
Favoredd [%] 95.43 95.73 93.45 94.75
Poor rotamers [%] 2.11 0.71 0.99 1.69
Bond length/bond anglese [%] 0 0 0 0
f 0 0 0 0
Molprobibty scores [%] 75 92 77 75
a

RMSD was calculated with the UCSF-chimera molecular modeling program [37] using all Cα atoms for calculation.

b

Number of clashes per 1000 atoms.

c

Percentage of residues with phi-psi angle combinations that lie in the disallowed region of the Ramachandran plot.

d

Percentage of residues with phi-psi angle combinations that lie in the favored region of the Ramachandran plot.

e

Percentage of backbone bond length/bond angles >4 standard deviations from the accepted values.

f

Number of residues with Cβ deviations ±0.25 Å.