Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 3;14:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-152

Table 4.

RPR-associated QTL in the two RIL populations

Population QTL Chromosome Peak a (cM) Marker interval Genetic interval (cM) Physical position b (Mb) LOD A c R 2 (%) d
POP-HRC
qRPR2
2
162.1
SYN6917–PZE102193611
160.1-162.2
236.4–237.0
3.8
0.45
4.4
qRPR3-1
3
107.4
PZE-103123325–SYN23245
104.5-111.1
181.1–184.7
14.0
1.05
18.9
qRPR3-2
3
133.9
PZE-103156977–PZE-103160158
132.4-134.2
209.1–211.2
5.9
0.61
6.7
qRPR9
9
47.0
PZE-109058177–PZE-109076761
42.4-50.0
99.4–124.3
6.6
0.66
8.1
 
Totale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50.4
POP-BYB
qRPR4
4
55.7
PZE-104080388–PZE-104084757
50.3-55.7
154.7–158.7
7.9
-0.39
14.0
qRPR6-1
6
89.4
PZE-106088503–SYN4646
88.5-91.9
146.1–147.7
3.6
0.27
6.0
qRPR6-2
6
143.3
SYN34377–PHM3466.69
133.3-148.2
163.2–167.0
6.2
-0.39
13.8
  Totale               31.7

aThe peak position with the highest LOD of each QTL.

bThe physical positions of the identified QTL according to B73 reference sequence Version 5.60 [38].

c Additive effect of the identified QTL: a positive value indicates that the alleles from H127R and By804 increases RPR, and a negative value indicates that the alleles from Chang7-2 and B73 increase RPR.

dPercentage of phenotypic variation explained by additive effects of the identified QTL.

eTotal percentage of phenotypic variation explained by all QTL computed by MIM.