Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun;80(12):3708–3720. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00254-14

TABLE 1.

The occurrence of microbial source tracking markers and pathogens prior to CTD intervention during years 2005 to 2006 of the study

Microbial targeta % of samples positive for microbial targetb
n
CTDD CTDU UCTDD UCTDU CTDD − UCTDD CTDD − UCTDU CTDU − UCTDD CTDU − UCTDU CTDD CTDU UCTDD UCTDU
Total Bacteroidales 100 100 LD 88 LDc 12 LD 12 29 21 LD 25
Bacteroidales markers
    Human 7 0 LD 4 LD 3 LD −4 29 21 LD 25
    Pig 3 0 LD 0 LD 3 LD 0 29 21 LD 25
    Ruminant 10 19 LD 12 LD −2 LD 7 29 21 LD 25
    Muskrat 3 14 LD 16 LD −13 LD −2 29 21 LD 25
    Canada goose 7 0 LD 0 LD 7 LD 0 29 21 LD 25
    Livestock 14 19 LD 12 LD 2 LD 7 29 21 LD 25
    Wildlife 10 14 LD 16 LD −6 LD −2 29 21 LD 25
Other bacteria
    Listeria spp. 89 100 94 100 −5 −11 6 0 18 16 17 15
    Listeria monocytogenes 33 19 12 13 21 20 7 6 18 16 17 15
    Salmonella spp. 6 9 9 13 −3 −7 0 −4 35 32 33 31
    Campylobacter spp. 31 31 24 35 7 −4 7 −4 35 32 33 31
    E. coli O157:H7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 32 33 31
a

Viral pathogens and coliphages were not collected in this period. “Livestock” and “Wildlife” are summary classes: “Livestock” represents pigs and/or ruminants, and “Wildlife” represents muskrats and/or Canada geese.

b

No significant differences between site pairwise comparisons were observed using Fisher's exact test (significant at P < 0.05). Note that there were percentage point differences for most CTD site − UCTD site percentage point values shown. Negative values indicate the occurrence of a greater percentage in UCTD versus pre-CTD by the indicated percentage point value and site comparison.

c

LD, limited data.