TABLE 1.
Microbial targeta | % of samples positive for microbial targetb |
n |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTDD | CTDU | UCTDD | UCTDU | CTDD − UCTDD | CTDD − UCTDU | CTDU − UCTDD | CTDU − UCTDU | CTDD | CTDU | UCTDD | UCTDU | |
Total Bacteroidales | 100 | 100 | LD | 88 | LDc | 12 | LD | 12 | 29 | 21 | LD | 25 |
Bacteroidales markers | ||||||||||||
Human | 7 | 0 | LD | 4 | LD | 3 | LD | −4 | 29 | 21 | LD | 25 |
Pig | 3 | 0 | LD | 0 | LD | 3 | LD | 0 | 29 | 21 | LD | 25 |
Ruminant | 10 | 19 | LD | 12 | LD | −2 | LD | 7 | 29 | 21 | LD | 25 |
Muskrat | 3 | 14 | LD | 16 | LD | −13 | LD | −2 | 29 | 21 | LD | 25 |
Canada goose | 7 | 0 | LD | 0 | LD | 7 | LD | 0 | 29 | 21 | LD | 25 |
Livestock | 14 | 19 | LD | 12 | LD | 2 | LD | 7 | 29 | 21 | LD | 25 |
Wildlife | 10 | 14 | LD | 16 | LD | −6 | LD | −2 | 29 | 21 | LD | 25 |
Other bacteria | ||||||||||||
Listeria spp. | 89 | 100 | 94 | 100 | −5 | −11 | 6 | 0 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 15 |
Listeria monocytogenes | 33 | 19 | 12 | 13 | 21 | 20 | 7 | 6 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 15 |
Salmonella spp. | 6 | 9 | 9 | 13 | −3 | −7 | 0 | −4 | 35 | 32 | 33 | 31 |
Campylobacter spp. | 31 | 31 | 24 | 35 | 7 | −4 | 7 | −4 | 35 | 32 | 33 | 31 |
E. coli O157:H7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 32 | 33 | 31 |
Viral pathogens and coliphages were not collected in this period. “Livestock” and “Wildlife” are summary classes: “Livestock” represents pigs and/or ruminants, and “Wildlife” represents muskrats and/or Canada geese.
No significant differences between site pairwise comparisons were observed using Fisher's exact test (significant at P < 0.05). Note that there were percentage point differences for most CTD site − UCTD site percentage point values shown. Negative values indicate the occurrence of a greater percentage in UCTD versus pre-CTD by the indicated percentage point value and site comparison.
LD, limited data.