Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;80(13):3930–3942. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00245-14

TABLE 1.

Summary of samples extracted, variables tested, and controls used

Filter test Variable(s)a IDb Sample typec Vol processed, ml (type of processing)d Control(s)e
Flow rate Temp (7–35°C), pressure (25–214 kPa) Seawater, AW 96–97 (F)
Seawater, ALOHA 1,000–1,100 (F)
Pure water Variable
Extraction efficiency Flush direction Seawater (<0.22 μm), KB 200 (F)
Seawater, KB 200 (F)
A Phage 2 (F) Liquid
B Bacterial culture 3 (F) Liquid
C Protist culture 1 (F) Pelleted*
% recovery D, E Seawater, KB 11.7 (F) Liquid, pelleted**
Vol loaded F, G Seawater, KB 10, 50, 250, 500, 1,000 (F) Liquid, pelleted**
H Protist culture 1, 2, 4 (F) Liquid
Buffer chemistry (SDS vs GuHCl), filter material (AAO, PES) I, J Bacterial culture 3 (F) Liquid
Proteinase K, lysozyme Seawater, AW 2 (C), 50 (F) Pelleted*
Buffer chemistry (SDS vs LB3) Seawater, KB 500 (F)
Buffer chemistry (SDS vs LB1) K Seawater, AW 50 (F) Pelleted*
DNA trapping DNA size DNA, 5-kb ladder 0.5 (F) Unfiltered ladder
a

For buffer chemistry, SDS refers to extractions using the MasterPure kit, GuHCl refers to extractions using the DNeasy kit, and LB1 and LB3 refer to nonproprietary lysis buffers. The SDS-versus-LB1 extraction was conducted with and without lysozyme.

b

Experiments for which extraction efficiency was calculated are assigned an identification (ID) letter (A to K) for cross-referencing to Table 3.

c

For environmental samples, locations were Ala Wai Canal (AW), Station ALOHA (ALOHA), and Kāne‘ohe Bay (KB).

d

Processing consisted of filtration (F) or centrifugation (C).

e

Controls for extraction efficiency tests consisted of direct extractions of cells or viruses, including the liquid in which they were suspended (liquid) or after centrifuging to sediment primarily cells (*) or cells and viruses (**) as indicated (pelleted).