Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;80(13):4021–4033. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03939-13

TABLE 6.

Generated EC20s across a range of community indices

Community indexa Modelb Plot Treatment
EC20
Model parameterse
% C Exposure Concnc SEd b d e
Sobs W2.3 P1 5 Short NAf NA −0.03 171.0 1.9
SE (25.32) P2 8 Short 140 80 −0.44 91.9 403.4
df = 23 P3 36 Short 30 340 −0.15 124.8 871.3
P4 6.7 Long 1,300 1,000 −0.66 111.4 2,763.7
ACE W2.3 P1 5 Short NA NA 0.04 154.0 4,867.1
SE (26.17) P2 8 Short 20 220 −0.26 94.9 149.1
df = 23 P3 36 Short NA NA −0.03 153.2 51.5
P4 6.7 Long 1,300 2,000 −0.53 103.2 3,118.4
Chao1 W2.3 P1 5 Short NA NA 0.00 157.3 0.00001
SE (20.5) P2 8 Short 30 16 −0.28 93.9 146.6
df = 23 P3 36 Short 11,000 6,400 −0.61 97.9 23,398
P4 6.7 Long 1,500 620 −0.59 109.1 3,334
Shannon (H′) W2.3 P1 5 Short 8,100 850 −1.91 98.8 10,384
SE (7.14) P2 8 Short 250 110 −0.40 99.9 816.4
df = 23 P3 36 Short 2,200 1,900 −0.28 98.5 11,865
P4 6.7 Long 3,700 5,300 −0.21 102.3 36,297
Pielou's evenness (J′) W2.3 P1 5 Short 10,400 830 −1.13 100.5 15,863
SE (3.30) P2 8 Short 140 470 −0.24 102.0 9,992.5
df = 23 P3 36 Short 50 390 −0.09 125.4 11,809
P4 6.7 Long NA NA 50,273 145.6 882.4
Weighted UniFrac W2.3 P1 5 Short 10 1.28 −0.13 159.4 6.42
SE (7.41) P2 8 Short 60 110 −0.26 91.9 348.4
df = 23 P3 36 Short 10 0.16 −0.12 172.9 1.98
P4 6.7 Long 940 750 −0.41 93.4 3,027.9
Acidobacteria/Proteobacteria ratio LL3 P1 5 Short 10 56 0.38 1.3 184.1
SE (3.4) P2 8 Short 40 110 1.03 1.04 159.5
P3 36 Short 4,500 2,700 1.05 1.7 17,195
P4 6.7 Long 10 0.14 0.24 2.06 2.7
nifH W1.3 P1 5 Short NA NA −0.02 282.5 15,863
SE(25.39) P2 8 Short NA NA 0.01 320.4 9,992.5
df = 90 P3 36 Short 10 0.1 0.13 244.0 11,809
P4 6.7 Long 10 0.1 0.09 219 882.4
amoA W2.3 P1 5 Short 10 0.06 −0.16 214. 0.4
SE (17.0) P2 8 Short 410 240 −0.40 104.2 1,356.6
df = 90 P3 36 Short 200 490 −0.25 113.7 1,337.6
P4 6.7 Long 10 0.06 −0.20 228.4 0.2
nosZ W2.3 P1 5 Short 130 110 0.54 1,244.0 2,066.2
SE (17.37) P2 8 Short 740 540 0.78 1,702.2 5,119.1
df = 90 P3 36 Short 520 830 5.84 526.2 671.5
P4 6.7 Long 30 41 0.66 605.6 306.8
a

Sobs, species observed; ACE, abundance-based coverage estimation; nifH, amoA, and nosZ, the abundance of functional genes within the nitrogen cycle as determined through qPCR.

b

The best-fitting dose response curve for the data as determined by AIC. W2.3, Weibull 2 curve/3 parameters; W1.3, Weibull 1 curve/3 parameters; LL3, log logistic curve/3 parameters.

c

The concentration that corresponds to a 20% effective change on the community.

d

The associated standard error of the EC20 estimate only.

e

Model parameters are defined as b = relative slope, d = upper limit, and e = point of inflection.

f

NA, no reliable dose response curve could be fitted.