Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;88(13):7589–7601. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00302-14

TABLE 4.

Comparison of RT mutation frequencies versus WT: class 3 multiple nucleotide substitution mutations (total)d

Enzyme ID Mutation frequencya Mutation rateb Mutation fractionc (%) Raw (FET) P value BH (FDR)-adjusted P value BH significance
WT 55/205,171 1.8 × 10−6 12
Y115F 42/93,725 2.9 × 10−6 8 0.0155 0.0414 *
Q151M 69/209,064 2.2 × 10−6 13 0.2811 0.3213
M184I 84/150,110 3.7 × 10−6 18 <0.0001 0.0002 ***
M184V 68/172,601 2.6 × 10−6 15 0.0371 0.0741
a

Mutation frequency data represent the number of mutant lacZα sequences divided by the total number of recovered clones.

b

Mutation rate data represent the mutation frequency divided by the size of the lacZα target sequence. Because the data were obtained with a one-round vector, the rate data were calculated as mutations/bp/generation.

c

Mutation fraction data represent the number of class-specific mutant lacZα sequences divided by the total number of mutant lacZα sequences.

d

Raw (FET) data represent P values of the significance of the results of comparisons to the WT by Fisher's exact test. To control for compounding type I error in these multiple comparisons, the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH)/false-discovery-rate (FDR) corrections to significance were applied to the significant P values where a single asterisk (*) represents 0.05 or less, two asterisks (**) represent 0.01 or less, three asterisks (***) represent 0.001 or less, and four asterisks (****) represent 0.0001 or less.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure