Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;88(13):7589–7601. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00302-14

TABLE 6.

Comparison of RT mutation frequencies versus WT: class 4 indel mutationsd

Enzyme ID Mutation frequencya Mutation rateb Mutation fractionc (%) Raw (FET) P value BH (FDR)-adjusted P value BH significance
WT 18/205,171 5.7 × 10−7 4
Y115F 26/93,725 1.8 × 10−6 5 0.0002 0.0018 **
Q151M 29/209,064 9.1 × 10−7 5 0.1447 0.5787
M184I 17/150,110 7.4 × 10−7 4 0.4954 0.7927
M184V 21/172,601 8.0 × 10−7 5 0.3370 0.6739
a

Mutation frequency data represent the number of mutant lacZα sequences divided by the total number of recovered clones.

b

Mutation rate data represent the mutation frequency divided by the size of the lacZα target sequence. Because the data were obtained with a one-round vector, the rate data were calculated as mutations/bp/generation.

c

Mutation fraction data represent the number of class-specific mutant lacZα sequences divided by the total number of mutant lacZα sequences.

d

Raw (FET) data represent P values of the significance of the results of comparisons to the WT by Fisher's exact test. To control for compounding type I error in these multiple comparisons, the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH)/false-discovery-rate (FDR) corrections to significance were applied where a single asterisk (*) represents 0.05 or less, two asterisks (**) represent 0.01 or less, three asterisks (***) represent 0.001 or less, and four asterisks (****) represent 0.0001 or less.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure