Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 20;14(12):R143. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r143

Table 7.

Rate of evolution of ESE and (a) non-ESE sequence and (b) pseudoESE sequence at four-fold degenerate sites

Dataset Median ESE Median non-ESE % Difference P two-sided
A
ESR
0.3
0.39
-23.1
1.10E-13
INT2.400
0.32
0.36
-11.1
1.10E-13
INT3
0.3
0.36
-16.7
1.10E-13
INT3.400
0.3
0.35
-14.2
1.10E-13
INT3_ESR
0.3
0.35
-14.2
1.10E-13
INT3_ESR_400
0.29
0.35
-17.1
3.40E-13
Ke-ESE
0.35
0.34
2.9
8.20E-08
Ke-ESE400
0.38
0.34
11.8
1.10E-13
PESE
0.31
0.37
-16
1.10E-13
RESCUE
0.32
0.35
-8.5
5.70E-13
B
 
 
 
 
ESR
0.3
0.35
-14.3
4.50E-13
INT2.400
0.32
0.35
-8.5
4.50E-13
INT3
0.3
0.35
-14.3
4.50E-13
INT3.400
0.3
0.34
-11.8
4.50E-13
INT3_ESR
0.3
0.34
-11.8
4.50E-13
INT3_ESR_400
0.29
0.34
-14.7
2.30E-12
Ke-ESE
0.35
0.35
0
4.10E-06
Ke-ESE400
0.38
0.36
5.6
4.50E-13
PESE
0.31
0.35
-11.4
4.50E-13
RESCUE 0.32 0.35 -8.5 4.50E-13

We consider the proportion of four fold degenerate sites that are changed or unchanged when comparing mouse-human alignments. We split sites by whether in human the sequence matches an ESE or not (Table A) or ESE versus pseudoESE (Table B). We then perform a Wilcoxon paired test considering the rate of evolution of ESE and non-ESE or pseudoESE at each position away from an exon boundary. We also present the % difference between the medians, this being (median for ESE - median for non-ESE)/median for non-ESE. All tests are significant after Bonferonni correction (for consistency the P values are shown in bold).