Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 12;8(6):e2945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002945

Table 6. Distribution of STH infection at each branch of conditional inference tree.

Left Child Node * Right Child Node *
Internal Node # Independent Variable STH positive N (%) STH negative N (%) STH positive N (%) STH negative N (%)
1 District 96 (25%) 283 (75%) 101 (14%) 615 (86%)
2 % pupils reporting hand washing water always available at school 30 (16%) 156 (84%) 66 (34%) 127 (66%)
3 Pupil enrollment 58 (11%) 456 (89%) 43 (21%) 159 (79%)
4 Private latrine 40 (14%) 239 (86%) 18 (8%) 217 (92%)
5 Low SES 22 (16%) 115 (84%) 21 (32%) 44 (68%)
6 Intervention 26 (19%) 109 (81%) 14 (10%) 130 (90%)
7 Age 10 (10%) 90 (90%) 12 (32%) 25 (68%)
8 % pupils reporting soap always available at school 12 (44%) 15 (56%) 9 (24%) 29 (76%)
9 Dry season improved water source 9 (33%) 18 (67%) 17 (16%) 91 (84%)
10 % pupils reporting soap always available at school 8 (11%) 67 (89%) 9 (27%) 24 (73%)
11 Mother status 5 (15%) 29 (85%) 3 (7%) 38 (93%)

*See Figure 2.