Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Med Decis Making. 2013 Dec 3;34(6):746–755. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13513338

Table 4.

AHP-based versus Rank order-based decision priorities

AHP priority Rank-based priority AHP-Rank priority difference Spearman’s coefficient of correlation
n = 484

Major Criteria Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI rho 95% CI

Prevent Cancer 0.55 0.53 – 0.56 0.48 0.48 – 0.49 0.061 0.05 to 0.07 0.55 0.49 – 0.61
Minimize Side Effects 0.17 0.16 – 0.18 0.20 0.19 – 0.21 −0.028 −0.03 to −0.02 0.89 0.87 – 0.91
Avoid False Positives 0.15 0.14 – 0.16 0.17 0.16 – 0.18 −0.019 −0.023 to −0.015 0.91 0.89 – 0.93
Logistical considerations 0.14 0.13 – 0.15 0.15 0.14 – 0.16 −0.013 −0.017 to −0.01 0.88 0.86 – 0.90
Subcriteria
Screening frequency 0.32 0.30 – 0.34 0.35 0.33 – 0.37 0.076 0.069 to 0.083 0.92 0.91 – 0.94
Preparation for screening 0.25 0.23 – 0.26 0.27 0.25 – 0.28 0.056 0.052 to 0.06 0.87 0.85 – 0.89
Screening procedure 0.43 0.41 – 0.45 0.39 0.37 – 0.41 0.08 0.075 to 0.086 0.86 0.84 – 0.88