Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 12;8(6):e2954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002954

Table 3. Tabulation of PCR results. Distribution of participants grouped in function of increasing sum of PCR positive results obtained with their sample in the 8 PCR tests that were performed and proportion of parasitologically confirmed cases in each group.

Sum PCR pos Filter paper GE-buffer
INRB ITM INRB ITM
Participants A B A B A B A B Paras
0 1 (7.7%)
1 0 7 0 1 3 8 1 1 3 (14.3%)
2 13 2 18 6 2 2 19 2 5 5 (17.9%)
3 21 3 14 9 13 7 19 5 5 7 (28.0%)
4 28 3 8 10 6 6 11 8 8 8 (53.3%)
5 25 6 14 10 10 13 15 16 11 9 (47.4%)
6 15 5 9 24 24 26 21 26 27 24 (88.9%)
7 19 19 33 34 29 35 25 35 35 33 (94.3%)
8 27 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 53 (98.1%)

Sum PCR pos: Sum of positive PCR tests per sample; GE-buffer: guanidine hydrochloride EDTA buffer; INRB = Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale; ITM = Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp; A and B = replicates A and B on the same sample; Participants: number of participants per group; Paras = parasitologically confirmed sample.